Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35783589›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2022

Assessing kidney stone composition using smartphone microscopy and deep neural networks.

Ege Gungor Onal, Hakan Tekgul

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Theranostic roles of machine learning in clinical management of kidney stone disease.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ege Gungor OnalDepartment of Bioengineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Champaign Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3375-9235
Hakan TekgulDepartment of Computer Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta Georgia USA.
Georgia Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To propose a point-of-care image recognition system for kidney stone composition classification using smartphone microscopy and deep convolutional neural networks. Materials and methods: A total of 37 surgically extracted human kidney stones consisting of calcium oxalate (CaOx), cystine, uric acid (UA) and struvite stones were included in the study. All of the stones were fragmented from percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The stones were classified using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis before obtaining smartphone microscope images. The size of the stones ranged from 5 to 10 mm in diameter. Nurugo 400× smartphone microscope (Nurugo, Seoul, Republic of Korea) was functionalized to acquire microscopic images (magnification = 25×) of dry kidney stones using iPhone 6s+ (Apple, Cupertino, CA, USA). Each kidney stone was imaged in six different locations. In total, 222 images were captured from 37 stones. A novel convolutional neural network architecture was built for classification, and the model was assessed using accuracy, positive predictive value, sensitivity and F1 scores. Results: We achieved an overall and weighted accuracy of 88% and 87%, respectively, with an average F1 score of 0.84. The positive predictive value, sensitivity and F1 score for each stone type were respectively reported as follows: CaOx (0.82, 0.83, 0.82), cystine (0.80, 0.88, 0.84), UA (0.92, 0.77, 0.85) and struvite (0.86, 0.84, 0.85). Conclusion: We demonstrate a rapid and accurate point of care diagnostics method for classifying the four types of kidney stones. In the future, diagnostic tools that combine smartphone microscopy with artificial intelligence (AI) can provide accessible health care that can support physicians in their decision-making process.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceconvolutional neural networkkidney stonemachine learningpoint‐of‐care testingsmartphone microscopyurolithiasisurology

Identifiers

PMID35783589
PMCPMC9231678
OpenAlexW4206812748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.