ArticleBJUI compass2022
Assessing kidney stone composition using smartphone microscopy and deep neural networks.
Article in BJUI compass, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in urolithiasis: a systematic review of utilization and effectiveness.World journal of urology · 2024Pooled it
- Decoding chemical composition of urinary crystals from ultrasonic echo signals via deep learning.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Article
- Automatic classification of kidney stone components based on smartphone microscopy and the GoogLeNet model.BMC urology · 2026Article
- Kidney Stones as Minerals: How Methods from Geology Could Inform Urolithiasis Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Advances in Portable Optical Microscopy Using Cloud Technologies and Artificial Intelligence for Medical Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Transforming urinary stone disease management by artificial intelligence-based methods: A comprehensive review.Asian journal of urology · 2023Review
- Theranostic roles of machine learning in clinical management of kidney stone disease.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Review
- Assessing kidney stone composition using smartphone microscopy and deep neural networks.BJUI compass · 2022Article
- Seasonal events and journal milestones.BJUI compass · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To propose a point-of-care image recognition system for kidney stone composition classification using smartphone microscopy and deep convolutional neural networks. Materials and methods: A total of 37 surgically extracted human kidney stones consisting of calcium oxalate (CaOx), cystine, uric acid (UA) and struvite stones were included in the study. All of the stones were fragmented from percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The stones were classified using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis before obtaining smartphone microscope images. The size of the stones ranged from 5 to 10 mm in diameter. Nurugo 400× smartphone microscope (Nurugo, Seoul, Republic of Korea) was functionalized to acquire microscopic images (magnification = 25×) of dry kidney stones using iPhone 6s+ (Apple, Cupertino, CA, USA). Each kidney stone was imaged in six different locations. In total, 222 images were captured from 37 stones. A novel convolutional neural network architecture was built for classification, and the model was assessed using accuracy, positive predictive value, sensitivity and F1 scores. Results: We achieved an overall and weighted accuracy of 88% and 87%, respectively, with an average F1 score of 0.84. The positive predictive value, sensitivity and F1 score for each stone type were respectively reported as follows: CaOx (0.82, 0.83, 0.82), cystine (0.80, 0.88, 0.84), UA (0.92, 0.77, 0.85) and struvite (0.86, 0.84, 0.85). Conclusion: We demonstrate a rapid and accurate point of care diagnostics method for classifying the four types of kidney stones. In the future, diagnostic tools that combine smartphone microscopy with artificial intelligence (AI) can provide accessible health care that can support physicians in their decision-making process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.