ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022
The Clinical Efficacy of Cedilanid and Isosorbide Dinitrate plus Pericardial Dissection for Chronic Constrictive Pericarditis in the Elderly and Its Influence on Plasma Endothelin, Atrial Natriuretic Peptide, and Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index.
Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retracted: The Clinical Efficacy of Cedilanid and Isosorbide Dinitrate plus Pericardial Dissection for Chronic Constrictive Pericarditis in the Elderly and Its Influence on Plasma Endothelin, Atrial Natriuretic Peptide, and Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-12-13Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of cedilanid and isosorbide dinitrate plus pericardial dissection for chronic constrictive pericarditis in the elderly. Methods: Ninety elderly patients with chronic constrictive pericarditis admitted to our hospital from March 2018 to October 2020 were recruited and assigned to receive either cedilanid and isosorbide dinitrate (control group A), pericardial dissection (control group B), or cedilanid and isosorbide dinitrate plus pericardial dissection (combination group) via random number table method, with 30 patients in each group. Outcome measures included plasma endothelin, atrial natriuretic peptide, system immune-inflammation indices, treatment effect, quality of life, mental state, and treatment satisfaction. Results: The combination group had significantly higher treatment satisfaction and treatment efficacy than control groups A and B ( Conclusion: Cedilanid and isosorbide dinitrate plus pericardial dissection for elderly patients with chronic constrictive pericarditis enhances the level of plasma endothelin, atrial natriuretic peptide, and systemic immune-inflammation indexes of patients and improves their quality of life, which shows great potential for clinical promotion.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.