Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35783504›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022

Value of Intensive Nursing Detail Management in Intensive Care Unit Nursing.

Yansong Li, Lehong Zhou, Qin Wei

RetractedOpen access · hybridAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Retracted: Value of Intensive Nursing Detail Management in Intensive Care Unit Nursing.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Retraction · 2023-06-21Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/8E6BB97ABCDA4AFB56BDEFBF48E38A
  • Retracted
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yansong LiNursing Department, Shiyan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Shiyan, Hubei Province, China.
Lehong ZhouCritical Care Medicine, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei 442000, China.
Qin WeiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei 442000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4828-2062
Hubei University of Medicine · CNPeople's Hospital of Shiyan · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the value of intensive nursing detail management in intensive care unit (ICU) nursing. Methods: In this prospective study, 100 ICU patients in Shiyan Maternal and Child Health Hospital between January 2019 and March 2020 were assessed for eligibility and recruited. They were concurrently randomly assigned (1 : 1) to receive either conventional nursing (control group) or intensive nursing detail management (study group). The clinical endpoint was the nursing efficiency. Results: Intensive nursing detail management was associated with significantly higher scores in basic nursing, quality of nursing, and quality of management versus conventional nursing ( Conclusion: Intensive nursing detail management is effective and safe in ICU nursing, so it is worthy of clinical application.

Identifiers

PMID35783504
PMCPMC9242789
OpenAlexW4283265592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.