Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35783320›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022

Point-of-Care Gastric Ultrasound Confirms the Inaccuracy of Gastric Residual Volume Measurement by Aspiration in Critically Ill Children: GastriPed Study.

Frederic V Valla, Eloise Cercueil, Claire Morice, Lyvonne N Tume, Lionel Bouvet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate Not Routinely Measuring Gastric Residual Volume to Guide Enteral Feeding Versus Routine Measurement in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Children (GASTRIC-PICU).Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Impact of implementing an evidence-based definition of enteral nutrition intolerance on nutrition delivery: A prospective, cross-sectional cohort study.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Frederic V VallaDepartment of Pediatrics, Pediatric Intensive Care, Lyon University Children Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Eloise CercueilDepartment of Pediatrics, Pediatric Intensive Care, Lyon University Children Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Claire MoriceDepartment of Pediatrics, Pediatric Intensive Care, Lyon University Children Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Lyvonne N TumeDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care Alder Hey Children's Hospital, School of Health & Society, University of Salford, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Lionel BouvetDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lyon University Children Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Hospices Civils de Lyon · FRUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Salford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: No consensus exists on how to define enteral nutrition tolerance in critically ill children, and the relevance of gastric residual volume (GRV) is currently debated. The use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasing among pediatric intensivists, and gastric POCUS may offer a new bedside tool to assess feeding tolerance and pre-procedural status of the stomach content. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary pediatric intensive care unit. Children on mechanical ventilation and enteral nutrition were included. Gastric POCUS was performed to assess gastric contents (empty, full of liquids or solids), and gastric volume was calculated as per the Spencer formula. Then, GRV was aspirated and measured. The second set of gastric POCUS measurements was performed, similarly to the first one performed prior to GRV measurement. The ability of GRV measurement to empty the stomach was compared to POCUS findings. Both GRV and POCUS gastric volumes were compared with any clinical signs of enteral feeding intolerance (vomiting). Results: Data from 64 children were analyzed. Gastric volumes were decreased between the POCUS measurements performed pre- and post-GRV aspiration [full stomach, Discussion: Gastric residual volume aspiration failed to empty the stomach and appeared unreliable as a measure of gastric emptiness. Gastric POCUS needs further evaluation to confirm its role.

Indexed as

critical careenteral nutritionfeeding tolerancegastric tubepediatric intensive care

Identifiers

PMID35783320
PMCPMC9240217
OpenAlexW4282938486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.