ArticleWorld neurosurgery: X2022
Comparing Fusion Rates Between Fresh-Frozen and Freeze-Dried Allografts in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.
Article in World neurosurgery: X, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transforming spinal surgery with innovations in biologics and additive manufacturing.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Bone void filler materials for augmentation in comminuted fractures: a comprehensive review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Review
- Allografts use in orthopedic surgery: trend change over the past 11 years from a regional tissue bank.Cell and tissue banking · 2024Article
- The Use of Glenoid Structural Allografts for Glenoid Bone Defects in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Letter to the Editor Regarding "Comparing Fusion Rates Between Fresh-Frozen and Freeze-Dried Allografts in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion".World neurosurgery: X · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this retrospective study is to compare the fusion rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery using freeze-dried versus fresh-frozen allografts. Methods: The study comprised 79 patients. Fifty-one patients received freeze-dried allograft (106 total spinal levels) and 28 patients received fresh-frozen allograft (50 total spinal levels). Fusion was assessed through trabecular bridging on follow-up anterior-posterior/lateral radiographs. Trabecular bridging was assessed on the superior and inferior borders of each spinal level and given a fusion grade. Complete fusion is defined as >50% bridging between superior and inferior borders of the bone graft; union is complete fusion in <26 weeks; delayed union is complete fusion after 26 weeks; and fibrous union is <50% bridging at ≥1 borders over 52 weeks. Results: All spinal levels reached complete fusion for both graft types. Of the freeze-dried treated cervical spinal levels, 77.35% (82/106) reached union (adequate trabecular bridging within 6 months) without delay compared with 80% (35/50) for the fresh-frozen bone graft group ( Conclusions: From this study, freeze-dried and fresh-frozen allografts showed comparable rates of union, and both allografts can be used interchangeably for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.