Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35783004›Full record

ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2022

Comparison of minimally invasive and open TLIF outcomes with more than seven years of follow-up.

Jae-Young Hong, Won Seok Kim, Jiwon Park, Chi Heon Kim, Hae-Dong Jang

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06427850 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Topical Tranexamic Acid on Postoperative Drainage in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF): A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThanawan LongsuwanRan2024 to 2026Enrolled28ConditionsDegenerative Spine Diseases, Surgical WoundArmsTranexamic acid, Normal saline
NCT06545032 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Minimal Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar and Lumbosacral Spine Diseases : Clinical and Surgical Outcome

TypeinterventionalSponsorSohag UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsDegenerative Spine DiseasesArmslumbar fusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with unilateral vs. bilateral pedicle screw fixation in iatrogenic spondylolysis: an in-vitro human cadaveric model.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jae-Young HongDepartment of Orthopedics, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, South Korea.
Won Seok KimDepartment of Orthopedics, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, South Korea.
Jiwon ParkDepartment of Orthopedics, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, South Korea.
Chi Heon KimSeoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Hae-Dong JangDepartment of Orthopedics, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Buchunl, South Korea.
Korea University · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KRSoonchunhyang University Hospital Seoul · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Few studies directly comparing minimally invasive (MI) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and open TLIF offering long-term follow-up data have been performed to date. Therefore, we sought to compare mid- to long-term outcomes between these two surgical approaches. Methods: This was a retrospective data analysis of two surgical groups. We analyzed the details of 97 patients with degenerative lumbar disease who were treated with MI TLIF (n = 55) or open TLIF (n = 42) between 2011-2014 and had at least seven years of follow-up data available. Peri- and postoperative outcomes were compared. To evaluate rates of adjacent segment disease (ASD) and revisions, frequencies of radiologic, symptomatic, and operative ASD were analyzed accordingly. Results: In terms of clinical outcome, the Oswestry Disability Index and visual analog scale scores were significantly reduced, with no difference between the groups. However, data for several peri- and postoperative outcomes, including perioperative blood loss, ambulation day, hospital stay, and operation time, varied in a manner favoring the MI TLIF group ( Conclusion: Patients undergoing MI TLIF showed favorable immediate postoperative outcomes and less radiographic ASD. However, the rates of fusion and operative ASD remained similar between the two groups after 7 years of follow-up.

Indexed as

Adjacent segment diseaseMinimally invasiveTransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Identifiers

PMID35783004
PMCPMC9243253
OpenAlexW4283836798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.