Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35782961›Full record

ArticleAdvanced materials interfaces2021

Biophysical Considerations in the Rational Design and Cellular Targeting of Flexible Polymeric Nanoparticles.

Samaneh Farokhirad, Sreeja Kutti Kandy, Andrew Tsourkas, Portonovo S Ayyaswamy, David M Eckmann, Ravi Radhakrishnan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced materials interfaces, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samaneh FarokhiradDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ 07114, USA; Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Sreeja Kutti KandyDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Andrew TsourkasDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Portonovo S AyyaswamyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
David M EckmannDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Ravi RadhakrishnanDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Funding

A physical sciences approach to investigate the role of exosomes in metastatic progressionU01CA250044 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GUO, WEI, RADHAKRISHNAN, RAVI · 2021 to 2025
$3.9M
Multiscale Modeling to Optimize Inhibition of Oncogenic ERK Pathway SignalingR01CA244660 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HLAVACEK, WILLIAM S, KHOLODENKO, BORIS N · 2020 to 2024
$3.4M
A plasticity and reprogramming paradigm for therapy resistance at the single cell levelU01CA227550 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI RADHAKRISHNAN, RAVI, RAJ, ARJUN · 2018 to 2022
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA244660NCI NIH HHS U01 CA227550NCI NIH HHS U01 CA250044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How nanoparticle (NP) mechanical properties impact multivalent ligand-receptor-mediated binding to cell surfaces, the avidity, propensity for internalization, and effects due to crowding remains unknown or unquantified. Through computational analyses, the effects of NP composition from soft, deformable NPs to rigid spheres, effect of tethers, the crowding of NPs at the membrane surface, and the cell membrane properties such as cytoskeletal interactions are addressed. Analyses of binding mechanisms of three distinct NPs that differ in type and rigidity (core-corona flexible NP, rigid NP, and rigid-tethered NP) but are otherwise similar in size and ligand surface density are reported; moreover, for the case of flexible NP, NP stiffness is tuned by varying the internal crosslinking density. Biophysical modeling of NP binding to membranes together with thermodynamic analysis powered by free energy calculations is employed, and it is shown that efficient cellular targeting and uptake of NP functionalized with targeting ligand molecules can be shaped by factors including NP flexibility and crowding, receptor-ligand binding avidity, state of the membrane cytoskeleton, and curvature inducing proteins. Rational design principles that confer tension, membrane excess area, and cytoskeletal sensing properties to the NP which can be exploited for cell-specific targeting of NP are uncovered.

Indexed as

avidityentropyMonte Carlo simulationnanoparticle flexibilitypolymeric nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID35782961
PMCPMC9248849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.