Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35782791›Full record

ArticleLearning and individual differences2022

What components of working memory are associated with children's reading skills?

Brittany M Morris, Christopher J Lonigan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning and individual differences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brittany M MorrisDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, United States of America.
Christopher J LoniganDepartment of Psychology and Florida Center for Reading Research, Florida State University, United States of America.

Funding

THE FLORIDA LONGITUDINAL STUDYP50HD052120 · NICHD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Nicole Sandi Patton-Terry · 2006 to 2026
$31.7M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD052120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working memory (WM) is a potentially important factor related to the development of and performance in reading skills. This study examined the differential relations between two components of the WM system (i.e., storage, processing) and reading. Latent variables were created based on data from 1900 children (1146 children in preschool-second grade and 754 children in third-fifth grade) recruited for a larger study concerning the development of reading comprehension. Results indicated that a general-specific model of WM was a good fit to the data and effectively isolated the variance unique to WM-processing from that of WM-storage. Using the general-specific model, relations between the components of WM and reading (e.g., reading comprehension, decoding) and reading-related (e.g., oral language, phonological awareness, nonverbal IQ) outcomes were examined. In contrast with previous studies that have suggested WM is consistently associated with reading comprehension, our findings indicate that both aspects of WM (i.e., storage, processing) operate primarily indirectly through foundational reading-related skills. In sum, the WM system is not specifically associated with reading comprehension as most of the effects of WM-processing are indirect via the effects on foundational reading-related skills.

Indexed as

Central executiveReading comprehensionStructural equation modelingWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID35782791
PMCPMC9249004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.