ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2022
Novelty detection for metabolic dynamics established on breast cancer tissue using 2D NMR TOCSY spectra.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- ML-based electromyography signal analysis for assessing rehabilitation exercise execution quality.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Automatic Identification of Potential Cellular Metabolites for Untargeted NMR Metabolomics.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Conformal novelty detection for multiple metabolic networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Machine Learning in Automated Monitoring of Metabolic Changes Accompanying the Differentiation of Adipose-Tissue-Derived Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells EmployingMetabolites · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most metabolic profiling approaches focus only on identifying pre-known metabolites on NMR TOCSY spectrum using configured parameters. However, there is a lack of tasks dealing with automating the detection of new metabolites that might appear during the dynamic evolution of biological cells. Novelty detection is a category of machine learning that is used to identify data that emerge during the test phase and were not considered during the training phase. We propose a novelty detection system for detecting novel metabolites in the 2D NMR TOCSY spectrum of a breast cancer-tissue sample. We build one- and multi-class recognition systems using different classifiers such as, Kernel Null Foley-Sammon Transform, Kernel Density Estimation, and Support Vector Data Description. The training models were constructed based on different sizes of training data and are used in the novelty detection procedure. Multiple evaluation measures were applied to test the performance of the novelty detection methods. Depending on the training data size, all classifiers were able to achieve 0% false positive rates and total misclassification error in addition to 100% true positive rates. The median total time for the novelty detection process varies between 1.5 and 20 seconds, depending on the classifier and the amount of training data. The results of our novel metabolic profiling method demonstrate its suitability, robustness and speed in automated metabolic research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.