Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35782732›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2022

Targeted removal of mitochondrial DNA from mouse and human extrachromosomal circular DNA with CRISPR-Cas9.

Weijia Feng, Gerard Arrey, Egija Zole, Wei Lv, Xue Liang, Peng Han, Marghoob Mohiyuddin, Henriette Pilegaard, Birgitte Regenberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Functional role of small extrachromosomal circular DNA in colorectal cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Variation of extrachromosomal circular DNA in cancer cell lines.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Weijia FengDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.
Gerard ArreyDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.
Egija ZoleDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.
Wei LvCollege of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, China.
Xue LiangDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.
Peng HanDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.
Marghoob MohiyuddinRoche Sequencing Solutions, Santa Clara, CA 95050 USA.
Henriette PilegaardDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.
Birgitte RegenbergDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extrachromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA) of chromosomal origin is common in eukaryotic cells. Amplification of oncogenes on large eccDNA (ecDNA) can drive biological processes such as tumorigenesis, and identification of eccDNA by sequencing after removal of chromosomal DNA is therefore important for understanding their impact on the expressed phenotype. However, the circular mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) might challenge the detection of eccDNA because the average somatic cell has hundreds of copies of mtDNA. Here we show that 61.2-99.5% of reads from eccDNA-enriched samples correspond to mtDNA in mouse tissues. We have developed a method to selectively remove mtDNA from total circular DNA by CRISPR/Cas9 guided cleavage of mtDNA with one single-guide RNA (sgRNA) or two sgRNAs followed by exonuclease degradation of the linearized mtDNA. Sequencing revealed that mtDNA reads were 85.9% ± 12.6% removed from eccDNA of 9 investigated mouse tissues. CRISPR/Cas9 cleavage also efficiently removed mtDNA from a human HeLa cell line and colorectal cancer samples. We identified up to 14 times more, and also larger eccDNA in CRISPR/Cas9 treated colorectal cancer samples than in untreated samples. We foresee that the method can be applied to effectively remove mtDNA from any eukaryotic species to obtain higher eccDNA yields.

Indexed as

CRISPR/Cas9eccDNAecDNAmtDNA removal

Identifiers

PMID35782732
PMCPMC9233219
OpenAlexW4282942641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.