Risk-reducing Salpingo-oophorectomy consults and practices during the COVID-19 pandemic.

A E O'Mara, C Benedict, A W Kurian, S K Wagner, E Diver

Open access · goldAbstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

Changes in Risk Tolerance for Ovarian Cancer Prevention Strategies during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2025
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A E O'MaraStanford University School of Medicine, 291 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94304, USA.

C BenedictStanford University School of Medicine, 291 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94304, USA.

A W KurianStanford Cancer Institute, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

S K WagnerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 900 Blake Wilbur Drive, Stanford, CA 94304, USA.

E DiverStanford Cancer Institute, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Stanford University · USPalo Alto Institute · USStanford Cancer Institute

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomies (RRSO) consults. Methods: Survey sent out to 1,127 full members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology in August 2021. Survey data included physician characteristics, practice location, and self-reported subjective and objective data about their RRSO consults. Results: We received 70 responses; half of the respondents were female; the mean age of respondents was 46 (range 35-65). 86% of providers transitioned RRSO consults to telehealth. There was no correlation between uptake of telemedicine by age (R Conclusions: Overall, telemedicine is now commonly used for RRSO consults and physicians noted very few barriers to its uptake. Discussion of sexual function was similar between modalities, the loss of the pelvic exam or private setting did not affect the time providers spent discussing sexual health, however sexual health topics discussed were limited.

Indexed as

ConsultsRisk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomySexual healthTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35782580

DOI10.1016/j.gore.2022.101036

PMCPMC9238144

OpenAlexW4283700914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC-ND

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.