ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022
Biomechanical Analysis of the Reasonable Cervical Range of Motion to Prevent Non-Fusion Segmental Degeneration After Single-Level ACDF.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of skip-level ACDF vs. contiguous ACDF in the treatment of skip-level cervical degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Biomechanical evaluation of a novel cervical interfacet self-locking cage versus ACDF: a goat cadaveric study combined with human CT-based finite element analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- A Review of Motion-Preserving Cervical Spinal Implants and Fusion Constructs.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Biomechanical effects of supplemental posterior cervical stabilization in one-to three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis of construct length-dependent stress shielding and adjacent segment mechanics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Biomechanical effect of cage size in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Article
- Biomechanical Analysis of Hybrid Artificial Discs or Zero-Profile Devices for Treating 1-Level Adjacent Segment Degeneration in ACDF Revision Surgery.Neurospine · 2024Article
- Determining a relative total lumbar range of motion to alleviate adjacent segment degeneration after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Biomechanical study of anterior transpedicular root screw intervertebral fusion system of lower cervical spine: a finite element analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Does the novel artificial cervical joint complex resolve the conflict between stability and mobility after anterior cervical surgery? a finite element study.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Preliminary exploration of the biomechanical properties of three novel cervical porous fusion cages using a finite element study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Article
- Biomechanical properties of different anterior and posterior techniques for atlantoaxial fixation: a finite element analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- Biomechanical performance of the novel assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A finite element analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- The application of finite element analysis to determine the optimal UIV of growing-rod treatment in early-onset scoliosis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The compensatory increase in intervertebral range of motion (ROM) after cervical fusion can increase facet joint force (FJF) and intradiscal pressure (IDP) in non-fusion segments. Guiding the post-ACDF patient cervical exercise within a specific ROM (defined as reasonable ROM) to offset the increase in FJF and IDP may help prevent segmental degeneration. This study aimed to determine the reasonable total C0-C7 ROM without an increase in FJF and IDP in non-fusion segments after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). A three-dimensional intact finite element model of C0-C7 generated healthy cervical conditions. This was modified to the ACDF model by simulating the actual surgery at C5-C6. A 1.0 Nm moment and 73.6 N follower load were applied to the intact model to determine the ROMs. A displacement load was applied to the ACDF model under the same follower load, resulting in a total C0-C7 ROM similar to that of the intact model. The reasonable ROMs in the ACDF model were calculated using the fitting function. The results indicated that the intervertebral ROM of all non-fusion levels was increased in the ACDF model in all motion directions. The compensatory increase in ROM in adjacent segments (C4/5 and C6/7) was more significant than that in non-adjacent segments, except for C3/4 during lateral bending. The intervertebral FJF and IDP of C0-C7 increased with increasing ROM. The reasonable ROMs in the ACDF model were 42.4°, 52.6°, 28.4°, and 42.25° in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, respectively, with a decreased ROM of 4.4-7.2%. The postoperative increase in FJF and IDP in non-fusion segments can be canceled out by reducing the intervertebral ROM within reasonable ROMs. This study provided a new method to estimate the reasonable ROMs after ACDF from a biomechanical perspective, and further in vitro and clinical studies are needed to confirm this.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.