Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35782405›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery2022

Implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for head and neck cancer patients: Considerations and best practices.

Aman Prasad, Kevin Chorath, Louis-Xavier Barrette, Beatrice Go, Jie Deng, Alvaro Moreira, Karthik Rajasekaran

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aman PrasadPerelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Kevin ChorathDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Louis-Xavier BarrettePerelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Beatrice GoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Jie DengSchool of Nursing, Laboratory of Innovative & Translational Nursing Research University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Alvaro MoreiraDepartment of Pediatrics University of Texas Health San Antonio San Antonio Texas USA.
Karthik RajasekaranDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been developed in numerous surgical specialties as a means of systematically improving patient recovery, functional outcomes, cost savings, and resource utilization. Such multidisciplinary initiatives seek to minimize variability in several aspects of perioperative patient care, helping to reduce inpatient length of hospital stay, complications, and the overall resource and financial burden of surgical care. Head and neck oncology patients stand to benefit from the implementation of comprehensive ERAS protocols, as these patients have complex medical needs that may dramatically impact multiple aspects of their recovery, including breathing, eating, nutrition, pain, speech, swallowing, and communication. Implementing ERAS protocols for head and neck cancer patients may present unique challenges, and require significant interdisciplinary coordination and collaboration. We therefore sought to provide a comprehensive guide to the planning and institution of such ERAS systems at institutions undertaking care of head and neck cancer patients. Key elements to consider in the implementation of successful ERAS protocols for this population include organizing a team consisting of frontline leaders such as nursing staff, medical specialists, and associated health professionals; designing interventions based on systematically evaluated, high-quality literature; and instituting a clear methodology for regularly updating protocols and auditing the success or potential limitations of a given intervention. Potential obstacles to the success of ERAS interventions for head and neck cancer patients include challenges in systematically tracking progress of the protocol, as well as resource limitations in a given health system.

Indexed as

enhanced recovery after surgeryERAShead and neckoncologyquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID35782405
PMCPMC9242413
OpenAlexW4283075648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.