Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35782404›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery2022

Head and neck cancer readmission reduction (HANCARRE) project: Reducing 30-day readmissions.

Sara Yang, William Adams, Carol Bier-Laning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Psychological experience of discharge readiness in head and neck cancer patients undergoing particle radiotherapy: A qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  2. Reconstructing Perioperative Patient Education in Head and Neck Surgery.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Head and neck cancer readmission reduction (HANCARRE) project: Reducing 30-day readmissions.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sara YangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Loyola University Medical Center Maywood Illinois USA.
William AdamsDepartment of Public Health Sciences Loyola University Chicago Maywood Illinois USA.
Carol Bier-LaningDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Loyola University Medical Center Maywood Illinois USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Unplanned 30-day readmissions result in increased costs and decreased patient satisfaction. The objective of this study was to compare readmission rates before and after a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative that focuses on patient and staff education, use of targeted skilled nursing facilities, and appropriate use of patient observation status. Methods: This was a quality improvement study of all unplanned admissions to the Head and Neck Oncology service at a tertiary care facility during a 3-year period between October 2015 and September 2018. In October 2016, when the Head and Neck Oncology service revised its discharge practices for patients undergoing extirpative and/or reconstructive surgery. These changes included enhancing patient education, increasing the use of a skilled nursing facility with directed staff education and patient handoffs by advanced practice nurses, and appropriate utilization of 23-h observation status for returning patients. The readmission rate from the pre-intervention era (October 2015 through September 2016) was compared to the readmission rate from the post-intervention era (October 2016 through September 2018). Secondary outcomes were the rates of 23-h observation within 30 days of the discharge as well as emergency room visits within 30 days of discharge. Results: In this sample of 449 patients, 161 (35.9%) were observed before the change-in-practice (before October 2016), and 288 (64.1%) were observed following the change-in-practice (after September 2016). On univariable analysis, the risk of readmission declined by approximately 41.4% from the pre-intervention era, though this conclusion was not statistically significant ( Conclusions: A three-part quality improvement strategy resulted in a clinically important decrease in 30-day readmissions, though the decline was not statistically significant. There were no significant changes in 23-h observation within 30 days of discharge or emergency room visits within 30 days of discharge.

Indexed as

30‐day readmissionshead and neck oncologyhealthcare utilization

Identifiers

PMID35782404
PMCPMC9242425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.