Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35782402›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery2022

Examination of care processes and treatment optimization for head and neck cancer patients in a community setting "hub and hub" model.

Harleen K Sethi, Elijah Walker, Travis Weinsheim, Matthew J Brennan, Christopher E Fundakowski

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Harleen K SethiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Abington-Jefferson Health Willow Grove Pennsylvania USA.
Elijah WalkerCollege of Applied Health Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana Illinois USA.
Travis WeinsheimDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Abington-Jefferson Health Willow Grove Pennsylvania USA.
Matthew J BrennanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Abington-Jefferson Health Willow Grove Pennsylvania USA.
Christopher E FundakowskiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Abington-Jefferson Health Willow Grove Pennsylvania USA.
Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine · USThomas Jefferson University Hospital · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To examine referral pattern, the timing of diagnostic/staging processes, and treatment initiation for new head and neck cancer patients in a community setting. Methods: Patients with a newly diagnosed previously untreated diagnosis of head neck cancer managed at Asplundh Cancer Pavilion/Abington Memorial Hospital from October 2018 to March 2020. Source of referral and preceding workup were examined as well as intervals between initial head and neck consult and various timepoints of treatment initiation. Results: One hundred and five patients were included in the study. The primary referral sources were external general otolaryngology (56.3%). Oral surgery and dermatology obtained tissue biopsy approximately 80% of the time before referral. The average time from the ordering of initial staging positron emission tomography/computed tomography to finalized results was 14 days (range: 10-25 days). Patients referred from dermatology and oral surgery were more likely to require single modality care, namely definitive surgical management. Time to treatment initiation average was 37 days (range: 29-41 days). Patients with longer treatment times noted significantly higher times to both radiation and medical oncology consults (48.42 vs. 18.13 days; Conclusions: No notable differences in treatment initiation times were identified based on referral source or extent of workup performed before head/neck surgery consult. It appears the largest opportunities for improvement in terms of reducing overall treatment length exist in the optimization of radiation initiation time.

Indexed as

head and neck cancerpackage timereferral sourcetime to treatment initiationtotal treatment length

Identifiers

PMID35782402
PMCPMC9242418
OpenAlexW4283072750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.