ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
Unsupervised computed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography image registration using a dual attention network.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- A review of image processing and analysis of computed tomography images using deep learning methods.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025Review
- SPW-TransUNet: three-dimensional computed tomography-cone beam computed tomography image registration with spatial perpendicular window Transformer.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Prior information guided deep-learning model for tumor bed segmentation in breast cancer radiotherapy.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Joint keypoint detection and description network for color fundus image registration.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Attention-based dual-branch deep network for sparse-view computed tomography image reconstruction.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The registration of computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) plays a key role in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). However, the large intensity variation between CT and CBCT images limits the registration performance and its clinical application in IGRT. In this study, a learning-based unsupervised approach was developed to address this issue and accurately register CT and CBCT images by predicting the deformation field. Methods: A dual attention module was used to handle the large intensity variation between CT and CBCT images. Specifically, a scale-aware position attention block (SP-BLOCK) and a scale-aware channel attention block (SC-BLOCK) were employed to integrate contextual information from the image space and channel dimensions. The SP-BLOCK enhances the correlation of similar features by weighting and aggregating multi-scale features at different positions, while the SC-BLOCK handles the multiple features of all channels to selectively emphasize dependencies between channel maps. Results: The proposed method was compared with existing mainstream methods on the 4D-LUNG data set. Compared to other mainstream methods, it achieved the highest structural similarity (SSIM) and dice similarity coefficient (DICE) scores of 86.34% and 89.74%, respectively, and the lowest target registration error (TRE) of 2.07 mm. Conclusions: The proposed method can register CT and CBCT images with high accuracy without the needs of manual labeling. It provides an effective way for high-accuracy patient positioning and target localization in IGRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.