ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
Stent-in-stent technique under fluoroscopy for removal of embedded esophageal stent: a retrospective case series.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Treatment of complications after esophageal stent placement and methods for removal of stents need to be improved. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stent-in-stent (SIS) removal of esophageal stent under fluoroscopy. Methods: This study analyzed the clinical data of consecutive patients undergoing esophageal stent removal by the SIS technique under fluoroscopy. The procedure was performed under local anesthesia on conscious sedated patients. Under fluoroscopy, a second esophageal stent was released within the lumen of the first esophageal stent. The second stent was larger than the first, with both ends protruding 1-2 cm beyond the ends of the first stent. Four weeks later, both esophageal stents were removed by the SIS technique under fluoroscopy. All procedures were performed by the same interventional radiologist (with >10 years of experience). Results: A total of 25 patients were treated by the SIS removal technique. In 23 patients, the first esophageal stent was easily removed by the SIS technique; in the other 2 patients, stent fracture occurred, and some residual nitinol wire had to be removed endoscopically. No serious complications occurred in any patient. Conclusions: The SIS removal technique appears to be a safe and effective method for removal of embedded esophageal metallic stents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.