Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35782247›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022

A simplified scoring protocol to improve diagnostic accuracy with the breast imaging reporting and data system in breast magnetic resonance imaging.

Yuting Zhong, Menglu Li, Jingjin Zhu, Boya Zhang, Mei Liu, Zhili Wang, Jiandong Wang, Yiqiong Zheng, Liuquan Cheng, Xiru Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yuting ZhongMedical School of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Beijing, China.
Menglu LiDepartment of Radiology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jingjin ZhuDepartment of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Boya ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Mei LiuDepartment of Pathology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhili WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jiandong WangDepartment of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yiqiong ZhengDepartment of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Liuquan Cheng *Department of Radiology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiru Li *Department of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) lexicon provides a standardized terminology for describing leision characteristics but does not provide defined rules for converting specific imaging features into diagnostic categories. The inter-reader agreement of the BI-RADS is moderate. In this study, we explored the use of a simplified protocol and scoring system for BI-RADS categorization which integrates the morphologic features (MF), kinetic time-intensity curve (TIC), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values with equal weights, with a view to providing a convenient and practical method for breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and improving the inter-reader agreement and diagnostic performance of BI-RADS. Methods: This cross-sectional, retrospective, single-center study included 879 patients with 898 histopathologically verified lesions who underwent an MRI scan on a 3.0 Tesla GE Discovery 750 MRI scanner between January 1, 2017, and June 30, 2020. The BI-RADS categorization of the studied lesions was assessed according to the sum of the assigned scores (the presence of malignant MF, lower ADC, and suspicious TIC each warranted a score of +1). Total scores of +2 and +3 were classified as category 5, scores of +1 were classified as category 4, and scores of +0 but with other lesions of interest were classified as category 3. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted, and the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of this categorization were investigated to assess its efficacy and its consistency with pathology. Results: There were 472 malignant, 104 risk, and 322 benign lesions. Our simplified scoring protocol had high diagnostic accuracy, with an area under curve (AUC) value of 0.896. In terms of the borderline effect of pathological risk and category 4 lesions, our results showed that when risk lesions were classified together with malignant ones, the AUC value improved (0.876 Conclusions: Our simplified scoring protocol that integrates MF, TIC, and ADC values with equal weights for BI-RADS categorization could improve both the diagnostic performance of the protocol for BI-RADS categorization in clinical practice and the understanding of the benign-risk-malignant breast diseases.

Indexed as

breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS)Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)diagnostic accuracyscoring protocol

Identifiers

PMID35782247
PMCPMC9246725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.