Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35782225›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2022

Intrathecal Drug Delivery: Advances and Applications in the Management of Chronic Pain Patient.

Jose De Andres, Salim Hayek, Christophe Perruchoud, Melinda M Lawrence, Miguel Angel Reina, Carmen De Andres-Serrano, Ruben Rubio-Haro, Mathew Hunt, Tony L Yaksh

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Jose De AndresSurgical Specialties Department, Valencia University Medical School, Valencia, Spain.
Salim HayekDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Christophe PerruchoudPain Center and Department of Anesthesia, La Tour Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
Melinda M LawrenceDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Miguel Angel ReinaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Montepríncipe University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Carmen De Andres-SerranoMultidisciplinary Pain Clinic, Vithas Virgen del Consuelo Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
Ruben Rubio-HaroAnesthesia and Pain Management Department, Provincial Hospital, Castellon, Spain.
Mathew HuntDepartment of Physiology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tony L YakshDepartments of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
University Hospitals of Cleveland · USFundación Hospital Provincial de Castellón · ESHospital Universitario HM Madrid · ESHospital Virgen del Camino · ESKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversitat de València · ESUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in our understanding of the biology of spinal systems in organizing and defining the content of exteroceptive information upon which higher centers define the state of the organism and its role in the regulation of somatic and automatic output, defining the motor response of the organism, along with the unique biology and spatial organization of this space, have resulted in an increased focus on therapeutics targeted at this extracranial neuraxial space. Intrathecal (IT) drug delivery systems (IDDS) are well-established as an effective therapeutic approach to patients with chronic non-malignant or malignant pain and as a tool for management of patients with severe spasticity and to deliver therapeutics that address a myriad of spinal pathologies. The risk to benefit ratio of IDD makes it a useful interventional approach. While not without risks, this approach has a significant therapeutic safety margin when employed using drugs with a validated safety profile and by skilled practioners. The present review addresses current advances in our understanding of the biology and dynamics of the intrathecal space, therapeutic platforms, novel therapeutics, delivery technology, issues of safety and rational implementation of its therapy, with a particular emphasis upon the management of pain.

Indexed as

antisensechronic painimplantable drug delivery system (IDDS)intrathecalneuromodulation

Identifiers

PMID35782225
PMCPMC9246706
OpenAlexW4283028809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.