Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35782192›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nephrology2022

Health Care Quality in CKD Subjects: A Cross-Sectional In-Hospital Evaluation.

L Rzayeva, I Matyukhin, O Ritter, S Patschan, D Patschan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nephrology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Towards a Model of Big Health Care Data Analytics in Panama: Chronic Kidney Disease.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L RzayevaZentrum Innere Medizin 1, Universitätsklinikum Brandenburg, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0033-2553
I MatyukhinZentrum Innere Medizin 1, Universitätsklinikum Brandenburg, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9520-8458
O RitterZentrum Innere Medizin 1, Universitätsklinikum Brandenburg, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4172-9378
S PatschanZentrum Innere Medizin 1, Universitätsklinikum Brandenburg, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2286-7356
D PatschanZentrum Innere Medizin 1, Universitätsklinikum Brandenburg, Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6914-5254
Universitätsklinikum Brandenburg an der Havel · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methods: The study was performed in a retrospective and observational manner. All adult (age 18 years or older) in-hospital subjects treated from January until December 2019 were included. CKD was diagnosed according to the KDIGO 2012 CKD Guideline. The following variables were assessed: CKD stage, quantification/analysis (yes/no) of blood pressure, proteinuria, serum phosphate, serum 25-OH-D3, ferritin and transferrin saturation, and blood gas analysis. In addition, recommendations of the following medicines were analyzed (given/not given): ACE inhibitor or sartan, phosphate binder, vitamin D3 (activated or native), iron, erythropoietin, and bicarbonate. It was also evaluated whether discharge letters contained CKD-related diagnoses or not. Results: In total, 581 individuals were included in the study. The majority of aspects related to the monitoring and therapeutic management of CKD were either considered in only a small proportion of affected individuals (e.g., quantification of PTH - 5.5%/25-OH-D3 - 6%/transferrin saturation - 13.6%) or avoided nearly at all (e.g., recommendation of erythropoietin-1%, documentation of CKD-MBD diagnosis-0.3%). A reasonable quality of care was identified concerning the blood pressure monitoring (performed in 100%) and blood gas analysis (55% of the patients received analysis). Serum phosphate was measured in 12.9%, particularly in subjects at higher CKD stages. Conclusions: The current investigation revealed poor quality of care in CKD patients treated at the Brandenburg University Hospital over the period of one year. Quality improvement must be achieved, most likely via a standardized educational program for physicians and a directer access to CKD management guidelines.

Identifiers

PMID35782192
PMCPMC9246581
OpenAlexW4283318754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.