Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35782186›Full record

ArticleIEEE internet of things journal2021

Contact Tracing Incentive for COVID-19 and Other Pandemic Diseases From a Crowdsourcing Perspective.

Pengfei Wang, Chi Lin, Mohammad S Obaidat, Zhen Yu, Ziqi Wei, Qiang Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE internet of things journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Estimation of Total Cost Required in Controlling COVID-19 Outbreaks by Financial Incentives.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pengfei WangSchool of Computer Science and TechnologyDalian University of Technology Dalian 116024 China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0906-4217
Chi LinSchool of SoftwareDalian University of Technology Dalian 116600 China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0302-5102
Mohammad S ObaidatCollege of Computing and InformaticsUniversity of Sharjah Sharjah UAE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1569-9657
Zhen YuSchool of Computer Science and TechnologyDalian University of Technology Dalian 116024 China.
Ziqi WeiSchool of SoftwareTsinghua University Beijing 100084 China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9402-8386
Qiang ZhangSchool of Computer Science and TechnologyDalian University of Technology Dalian 116024 China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3776-9799

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Governments of the world have invested a lot of manpower and material resources to combat COVID-19 this year. At this moment, the most efficient way that could stop the epidemic is to leverage the contact tracing system to monitor people's daily contact information and isolate the close contacts of COVID-19. However, the contact tracing data usually contains people's sensitive information that they do not want to share with the contact tracing system and government. Conversely, the contact tracing system could perform better when it obtains more detailed contact tracing data. In this article, we treat the process of collecting contact tracing data from a crowdsourcing perspective in order to motivate users to contribute more contact tracing data and propose the incentive algorithm named CovidCrowd. Different from previous works where they ask users to contribute their data voluntarily, the government offers some reward to users who upload their contact tracing data to reimburse the privacy and data processing cost. We formulate the problem as a Stackelberg game and show there exists a Nash equilibrium for any user given the fixed reward value. Then, CovidCrowd computes the optimal reward value which could maximize the utility of the system. Finally, we conduct a large-scale simulation with thousands of users and evaluation with real-world data set. Both results show that CovidCrowd outperforms the benchmarks, e.g., the user participating level is improved by at least 13.2% for all evaluation scenarios.

Indexed as

Contact tracingCOVID-19incentive algorithmNash equilibriumpandemic diseasesutility maximization

Identifiers

PMID35782186
PMCPMC8768981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.