Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35782022›Full record

ArticleFood and waterborne parasitology2022

Congenital toxoplasmosis: Should we still care about screening?

Eskild Petersen, Valeria Meroni, Daniel V Vasconcelos-Santos, Laurent Mandelbrot, Francois Peyron

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food and waterborne parasitology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Anti-Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Toxoplasmosis: A Timeless Challenge for Pregnancy.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Eskild PetersenInstitute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Science, University of Aarhus, Denmark.
Valeria MeroniMolecular Medicine Department, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Daniel V Vasconcelos-SantosUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Faculdade de Medicina, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Laurent MandelbrotAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Colombes, France; Université de Paris; Inserm IAME-U1137, Paris, France; FHU PREMA, Paris, France.
Francois PeyronInstitut de Parasitologie et de Mycologie Médicale Hôpital de la Croix Rousse, Lyon, France.
Aarhus University · DKHôpital de la Croix-Rousse · FRInserm · FRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prenatal systematic screening for congenital toxoplasmosis has been performed in Austria and France since 1975 and neonatal screening for congenital toxoplasmosis has been part of the New England Newborn screening program since 1986. In this narrative review we review the data leading up to the systematic screening programs in Austria and France, highlighting the main finding of the European Union funded research in the 1990s and early 2000s. Different descriptive studies of the effect of pre- or postnatal treatment are discussed.

Indexed as

Congenital toxoplasmosisScreeningToxoplasma gondii

Identifiers

PMID35782022
PMCPMC9249550
OpenAlexW4280591925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.