Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35782010›Full record

ReviewEvolutionary applications2022

Shift in beneficial interactions during crop evolution.

Hélène Fréville, Germain Montazeaud, Emma Forst, Jacques David, Roberto Papa, Maud I Tenaillon

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evolutionary applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Hélène FrévilleAGAP Univ Montpellier CIRAD INRAE Institut Agro Montpellier France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4212-0097
Germain MontazeaudAGAP Univ Montpellier CIRAD INRAE Institut Agro Montpellier France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5249-3404
Emma ForstDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences Università Politecnica delle Marche Ancona Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9557-3589
Jacques DavidAGAP Univ Montpellier CIRAD INRAE Institut Agro Montpellier France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2925-2258
Roberto PapaDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences Università Politecnica delle Marche Ancona Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9598-3131
Maud I TenaillonGénétique Quantitative et Evolution - Le Moulon INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech Université Paris-Saclay Gif-sur-Yvette France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0867-3678
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRMarche Polytechnic University · ITCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant domestication can be viewed as a form of co-evolved interspecific mutualism between humans and crops for the benefit of the two partners. Here, we ask how this plant-human mutualism has, in turn, impacted beneficial interactions within crop species, between crop species, and between crops and their associated microbial partners. We focus on beneficial interactions resulting from three main mechanisms that can be promoted by manipulating genetic diversity in agrosystems: niche partitioning, facilitation, and kin selection. We show that a combination of factors has impacted either directly or indirectly plant-plant interactions during domestication and breeding, with a trend toward reduced benefits arising from niche partitioning and facilitation. Such factors include marked decrease of molecular and functional diversity of crops and other organisms present in the agroecosystem, mass selection, and increased use of chemical inputs. For example, the latter has likely contributed to the relaxation of selection pressures on nutrient-mobilizing traits such as those associated to root exudation and plant nutrient exchanges via microbial partners. In contrast, we show that beneficial interactions arising from kin selection have likely been promoted since the advent of modern breeding. We highlight several issues that need further investigation such as whether crop phenotypic plasticity has evolved and could trigger beneficial interactions in crops, and whether human-mediated selection has impacted cooperation via kin recognition. Finally, we discuss how plant breeding and agricultural practices can help promoting beneficial interactions within and between species in the context of agroecology where the mobilization of diversity and complexity of crop interactions is viewed as a keystone of agroecosystem sustainability.

Indexed as

agroecologybiotic interactionsfacilitationkin selectionniche complementarityplant breeding

Identifiers

PMID35782010
PMCPMC9234679
OpenAlexW4225264017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.