Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35781999›Full record

ReviewSeminars in interventional radiology2022

Genicular Nerve Ablation Review Using Cooled-Radiofrequency Nerve Ablation.

Andrew Tran, David A Reiter, Anna R Cruz, Felix M Gonzalez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cooled radiofrequency ablation for patients with chronic postsurgical pain after total knee arthroplasty: Pilot clinical trial.Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew TranEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
David A ReiterDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, and Orthopedics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Anna R CruzDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine and Department of Orthopedics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Felix M GonzalezDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is globally the most prevalent joint disease and causes patients great pain, limited joint mobility, and psychological distress. Short- and long-term therapies like steroid injections and arthroplasty exist, respectively. Joint arthroplasty can effectively treat symptomatic end-stage OA, but most patients do not go through with surgery because they are not qualified, have comorbidities, or do not wish to undergo surgery. As a result, patients can turn to opioid agonists for pain relief, which contributes to the growing opioid epidemic that mars our communities. Cooled radiofrequency ablation (C-RFA) is an effective treatment modality that can alleviate the pain associated with moderate to severe OA, especially in patients who have tried and failed conservative therapy. This review article elucidates the benefits of C-RFA, while also walking through the technical steps to performing the procedure. For patients suffering from debilitating joint OA, especially of the knee, C-RFA is a minimally invasive procedure that ensures pain relief.

Indexed as

ablationcooled radiofrequencyinterventional radiologyjoint painnerveosteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID35781999
PMCPMC9246497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.