Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35781924›Full record

ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2021

Detecting Early-Warning Signals in Time Series of Visits to Points of Interest to Examine Population Response to COVID-19 Pandemic.

Qingchun Li, Zhiyuan Tang, Natalie Coleman, Ali Mostafavi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. COVID-19 Pandemic Risk Assessment: Systematic Review.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qingchun LiZachry Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringTexas A&M University College Station TX 77840 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0769-0238
Zhiyuan TangDepartment of Computer Science and EngineeringTexas A&M University College Station TX 77840 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8090-4944
Natalie ColemanZachry Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringTexas A&M University College Station TX 77840 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6779-5440
Ali MostafaviZachry Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringTexas A&M University College Station TX 77840 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9076-9408

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to examine population response to COVID-19 and associated policy interventions through detecting early-warning signals in time series of visits to points of interest (POIs). Complex systems, such as cities, would demonstrate early-warning signals (e.g., increased autocorrelation and standard deviation) when they approach phase transitions responding to external perturbation, such as crises, policy changes, and human behavior changes. In urban systems, population visits to POIs, such as restaurants, museums, and hospitals, represent a state of cities as complex systems. These states may undergo phase transitions due to population response to pandemic risks and intervention policies (e.g., social distancing and shelter-in-place orders). In this study, we conducted early-warning signal detection on population visits to POIs to examine population response to pandemic risks, and we evaluated time lags between detected early-warning dates and dates of first cases and policy interventions. We examined two early-warning signals, the increase of autocorrelation at-lag-1 and standard deviation, in time series of population visits to POIs in 17 metropolitan cities in the United States of America. We examined visits to grouped POIs according to two categories of essential services and non-essential services. The results show that: (1) early-warning signals for population response to COVID-19 were detected between February 14 and March 11, 2020 in 17 cities; (2) detected population response had started prior to shelter-in-place orders in 17 cities; (3) early-warning signals detected from the essential POIs visits appeared earlier than those from non-essential POIs; and 4) longer time lags between detected population response and shelter-in-place orders led to a less decrease in POI visits. The results show the importance of detecting early-warning signals during crises in cities as complex systems. Early-warning signals could provide important insights regarding the timing and extent of population response to crises to inform policymakers.

Indexed as

complex systemsCOVID-19Early-warning signalspandemicsresilience

Identifiers

PMID35781924
PMCPMC8768955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.