ArticleComputational statistics & data analysis2022
Brain Waves Analysis Via a Non-Parametric Bayesian Mixture of Autoregressive Kernels.
Article in Computational statistics & data analysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Frequency Band Analysis of Multiple Stationary Time Series.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Dynamic temporal neural patterns based on multichannel LFPs Identify different brain states during anesthesia in pigeons: comparison of three anesthetics.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Article
- Statistical inference for dependence networks in topological data analysis.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023Article
- Smooth online parameter estimation for time varying VAR models with application to rat local field potential activity data.Statistics and its interface · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The standard approach to analyzing brain electrical activity is to examine the spectral density function (SDF) and identify frequency bands, defined a priori, that have the most substantial relative contributions to the overall variance of the signal. However, a limitation of this approach is that the precise frequency and bandwidth of oscillations are not uniform across different cognitive demands. Thus, these bands should not be arbitrarily set in any analysis. To overcome this limitation, the Bayesian mixture auto-regressive decomposition (BMARD) method is proposed, as a data-driven approach that identifies (i) the number of prominent spectral peaks, (ii) the frequency peak locations, and (iii) their corresponding bandwidths (or spread of power around the peaks). Using the BMARD method, the standardized SDF is represented as a Dirichlet process mixture based on a kernel derived from second-order auto-regressive processes which completely characterize the location (peak) and scale (bandwidth) parameters. A Metropolis-Hastings within the Gibbs algorithm is developed for sampling the posterior distribution of the mixture parameters. Simulations demonstrate the robust performance of the proposed method. Finally, the BMARD method is applied to analyze local field potential (LFP) activity from the hippocampus of laboratory rats across different conditions in a non-spatial sequence memory experiment, to identify the most prominent frequency bands and examine the link between specific patterns of brain oscillatory activity and trial-specific cognitive demands.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.