ArticleReproductive medicine and biology
Analysis of clinical outcomes and meiotic segregation modes following preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements using aCGH/NGS in couples with balanced chromosome rearrangement.
Article in Reproductive medicine and biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Embryo ploidy outcomes of PGT-M+PGT-A compared with PGT-A alone: a multicenter real-world cohort study.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Structural rearrangements affect blastocyst development.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
- The clinical application and challenges of preimplantation genetic testing.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Application and Prospects of Long-Read Sequencers for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Structural Rearrangements.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Preimplantation genetic testing using comprehensive genomic copy number analysis is beneficial for balanced translocation carriers.Journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- Analysis of clinical outcomes and meiotic segregation modes following preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements using aCGH/NGS in couples with balanced chromosome rearrangement.Reproductive medicine and biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the effectiveness of PGT-SR by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) or next-generation sequencing (NGS) in preventing recurrent miscarriages. Methods: Thirty one couples with balanced translocation who underwent 68 PGT-SR cycles between 2012 and 2020 were evaluated. A total of 242 blastocysts were biopsied for aCGH or NGS. The genetically transferable blastocysts were transferred in the subsequent frozen-thawed single embryo transfer cycle. Results: The genetically transferable blastocyst rate was 21.2% (51/241). Thirty five genetically transferable blastocysts were transferred into the uterine cavity. The clinical pregnancy rate was 57.1% (20/35), and the ongoing pregnancy rate was 100.0% (20/20). The incidence of interchromosomal effect (ICE) was influenced by ovarian stimulation protocol, female age, and carrier's gender, but dependent on the types of balanced translocation carriers. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in meiotic segregation modes in ovarian stimulation protocols and carrier's gender. Interestingly, the incidence of adjacent-1 segregation in ≧40 years group increased significantly compared with <35 years group. Conclusions: For the first time in Japan, we show the effectiveness of PGT-SR using aCGH or NGS, which enables comprehensive analysis of chromosomes, in the prevention of recurrent miscarriages. Furthermore, our results may support better genetic counseling of balanced translocation carriers for PGT-SR cycles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.