Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35781891›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2022

FReSCO: Flow Reconstruction and Segmentation for low-latency Cardiac Output monitoring using deep artifact suppression and segmentation.

Olivier Jaubert, Javier Montalt-Tordera, James Brown, Daniel Knight, Simon Arridge, Jennifer Steeden, Vivek Muthurangu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The future of CMR: All-in-one vs. real-time CMR (Part 2).Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024
    Review
  6. Deep Learning-Based Reconstruction for Cardiac MRI: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Olivier JaubertUCL Center for Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7854-4150
Javier Montalt-TorderaUCL Center for Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University College London, London, UK.
James BrownDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Daniel KnightDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Simon ArridgeDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK.
Jennifer SteedenUCL Center for Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9792-2022
Vivek MuthuranguUCL Center for Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, University College London, London, UK.
Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe London College · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/CRLF/20/23004British Heart Foundation NH/18/1/33511British Heart Foundation PG/17/47/32963British Heart Foundation S032290Medical Research Council MR/S032290/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeReal-time monitoring of cardiac output (CO) requires low-latency reconstruction and segmentation of real-time phase-contrast MR, which has previously been difficult to perform. Here we propose a deep learning framework for "FReSCO" (Flow Reconstruction and Segmentation for low latency Cardiac Output monitoring).

methodsDeep artifact suppression and segmentation U-Nets were independently trained. Breath-hold spiral phase-contrast MR data (N = 516) were synthetically undersampled using a variable-density spiral sampling pattern and gridded to create aliased data for training of the artifact suppression U-net. A subset of the data (N = 96) was segmented and used to train the segmentation U-net. Real-time spiral phase-contrast MR was prospectively acquired and then reconstructed and segmented using the trained models (FReSCO) at low latency at the scanner in 10 healthy subjects during rest, exercise, and recovery periods. Cardiac output obtained via FReSCO was compared with a reference rest CO and rest and exercise compressed-sensing CO.

resultsThe FReSCO framework was demonstrated prospectively at the scanner. Beat-to-beat heartrate, stroke volume, and CO could be visualized with a mean latency of 622 ms. No significant differences were noted when compared with reference at rest (bias = -0.21 ± 0.50 L/min, p = 0.246) or compressed sensing at peak exercise (bias = 0.12 ± 0.48 L/min, p = 0.458).

conclusionsThe FReSCO framework was successfully demonstrated for real-time monitoring of CO during exercise and could provide a convenient tool for assessment of the hemodynamic response to a range of stressors.

Indexed as

ArtifactsMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineBreath HoldingCardiac OutputHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedStroke VolumeCardiac MRICardiac outputdeep learningFlow imagingmonitoringreal-time

Identifiers

PMID35781891
PMCPMC9545927
OpenAlexW4283809417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.