Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35781865›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2022

Comparison of probiotic Lactobacillus strains isolated from dairy and Iranian traditional food products with those from human source on intestinal microbiota using BALB/C mice model.

Samaneh Hatami, Masoud Yavarmanesh, Mojtaba Sankian, Seyed Ali Issazadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Robust Goat-DerivedVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Functional Annotation ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samaneh HatamiDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4689-7533
Masoud YavarmaneshDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran. yavarmanesh@um.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4771-5359
Mojtaba SankianImmunology Research Center, Medical School, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0602-6431
Seyed Ali IssazadehDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Quchan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Quchan, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4355-4436

Funding

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad 51765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compares the probiotic Lactobacillus strains isolated from dairy and Iranian traditional food products with those from human sources on intestinal microbiota using BALB/C mice model. First, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (M11), Limosilactobacillus fermentum (19SH), Lactobacillus acidophilus (AC2), and Lactobacillus gasseri (52b) strains, isolated from either Iranian traditionally fermented products or human (healthy woman vaginal secretions), identified with molecular methods and selected based on the surface hydrophobicity, auto- and co-aggregation, were investigated for their probiotic properties and compared with their standard probiotic strains in vitro. The native strains and their mixtures (MIX) were then orally fed to five groups of female inbred BALB/C mice over the course of 38 days by gavage at 0.5 and 4 McFarland, respectively, equal to 1.5 × 10

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeProbioticsAnimalsEscherichia coliFemaleHumansIranLactobacillusMiceMice, Inbred BALB CAdhesionBALB/C mice intestinal microbiotaCo-aggregationNative probiotic bacteriaProbiotic properties

Identifiers

PMID35781865
PMCPMC9433612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.