Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35781846›Full record

Article3D printing in medicine2022

Accuracy of guide wire placement for femoral neck stabilization using 3D printed drill guides.

Gregory R Roytman, Alim F Ramji, Brian Beitler, Brad Yoo, Michael P Leslie, Michael Baumgaertner, Steven Tommasini, Daniel H Wiznia

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3D printing in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gregory R RoytmanOrthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. gregory.roytman@yale.edu.
Alim F RamjiOrthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Brian BeitlerOrthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Brad YooOrthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Michael P LeslieOrthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Michael BaumgaertnerOrthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Steven TommasiniOrthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Daniel H WizniaOrthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Yale University · USYale Cancer Center · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NIA Short Term Research Training: Students in Health Professional SchoolsT35AG049685 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Sarwat I Chaudhry, Terri R. Fried · 2016 to 2026
$804k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIA NIH HHS T35 AG049685
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe goal of stabilization of the femoral neck is to limit morbidity and mortality from fracture. Of three potential methods of fixation, (three percutaneous screws, the Synthes Femoral Neck System, and a dynamic hip screw), each requires guide wire positioning of the implant(s) in the femoral neck and head. Consistent and accurate positioning of these systems is paramount to reduce surgical times, stabilize fractures effectively, and reduce complications. To help expedite surgery and achieve ideal implant positioning in the geriatric population, we have developed and validated a surgical planning methodology using 3D modelling and printing technology.

methodsUsing image processing software, 3D surgical models were generated placing guide wires in a virtual model of an osteoporotic proximal femur sawbone. Three unique drill guides were created to achieve the optimal position for implant placement for each of the three different implant systems, and the guides were 3D printed. Subsequently, a trauma fellowship trained orthopedic surgeon used the 3D printed guides to position 2.8 mm diameter drill bit tipped guide wires into five osteoporotic sawbones for each of the three systems (fifteen sawbones total). Computed Tomography (CT) scans were then taken of each of the sawbones with the implants in place. 3D model renderings of the CT scans were created using image processing techniques and the displacement and angular deviations at guide wire entry to the optimal sawbone model were measured.

resultsAcross all three percutaneous screw guide wires, the average displacement was 3.19 ± 0.12 mm and the average angular deviation was 4.10 ± 0.17

conclusionThe use of custom 3D printed drill guides to assist with the positioning of guide wires proved to be accurate for each of the three types of surgical strategies. Guides which are used to place more than 1 guide wire may have lower positional accuracy, as the guide may shift during multiple wire insertions. We believe that personalized point of care drill guides provide an accurate intraoperative method for positioning implants into the femoral neck.

Indexed as

3D printingDrill guideDynamic hip screwFemoral neck systemIn silicoPercutaneous screwsProphylaxis

Identifiers

PMID35781846
PMCPMC9254431
OpenAlexW4283797105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.