Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35781832›Full record

ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2022

[Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac devices : Useful tool or just artifacts?]

Sebastian Hilbert, Gerhard Hindricks

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sebastian HilbertAbteilung Rhythmologie, Herzzentrum Leipzig, Universitätsklinik für Kardiologie - Helios Stiftungsprofessur, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289, Leipzig, Deutschland. sebastian.hilbert@helios-gesundheit.de.
Gerhard HindricksAbteilung Rhythmologie, Herzzentrum Leipzig, Universitätsklinik für Kardiologie - Helios Stiftungsprofessur, Strümpellstr. 39, 04289, Leipzig, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac magnetic resonance tomography (CMR) in patients with implanted cardiac devices is a challenge. This is due to artifacts that can occur in the presence of metallic implants such as device leads and generators and can ultimately lead to impaired or non-diagnostic images. Preliminary studies indicate that by employing newly developed MRI sequences together with well-established sequences, these problems can be mitigated. To aid in daily routine, an adaptive imaging workflow has been proposed which allows for tailored image acquisition.

Indexed as

ArtifactsDefibrillators, ImplantableHeartHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingArtifactsCardiac implantsLate gadolinium enhancementPacemakerWideband sequence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.