Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35781707›Full record

ArticleJournal of food science2022

Optimizing the extrusion conditions for the production of expanded intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium) products.

Prince G Boakye, Akua Y Okyere, Ibilola Kougblenou, Ryan Kowalski, Baraem P Ismail, George A Annor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Heliyon · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Prince G BoakyeDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3621-4919
Akua Y OkyereDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2006-0636
Ibilola KougblenouDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Ryan KowalskiCW Brabender Instruments Inc, South Hackensack, New Jersey, USA.
Baraem P IsmailDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
George A AnnorDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5239-5751

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, the effects of extrusion conditions such as feed moisture content (20%, 24%, and 28%), screw speed (200, 300, and 400 rpm), and extrusion temperature (130, 150, and 170°C) on the physical and functional properties (moisture content, expansion ratio, bulk density, hardness, water absorption index [WAI], water solubility index [WSI]) of intermediate wheatgrass (IWG) were investigated for the first time. Response surface methodology was used to model and optimize the extrusion conditions to produce expanded IWG. The model coefficient of determination (R

Indexed as

CookingFood HandlingChemical PhenomenaPoaceaeSolubilityWaterWaterextrusionintermediate wheatgrass (IWG)optimizationphysical and functional propertiesresponse surface methodology (RSM)

Identifiers

PMID35781707
PMCPMC9541489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.