Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35781586›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2022

Risk factor analysis in women who underwent trial of labor after cesarean section: a multicenter study in Germany

George Gitas, Ibrahim Alkatout, Kubilay A Ertan, Achim Rody, Louisa Proppe, Mustafa Kocaer, Antonio Simone Laganà, Leila Allahqoli, Themistoklis Mikos, Soteris Sommer and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

George GitasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, GermanyORCID 0000-0002-9242-8041
Ibrahim AlkatoutDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, GermanyORCID 0000-0002-7194-6034
Kubilay A ErtanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leverkusen Municipal Hospital, Leverkusen, GermanyORCID 0000-0002-9451-9158
Achim RodyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, GermanyORCID 0000-0001-5904-0486
Louisa ProppeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, GermanyORCID 0000-0003-1989-2267
Mustafa KocaerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leverkusen Municipal Hospital, Leverkusen, GermanyORCID 0000-0003-1813-0500
Antonio Simone LaganàDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Filippo Del Ponte Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, ItalyORCID 0000-0003-1543-2802
Leila AllahqoliSchool of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, IranORCID 0000-0002-9851-6771
Themistoklis MikosDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, GreeceORCID 0000-0003-3454-8528
Soteris SommerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, GermanyORCID 0000-0002-2067-9415
Sascha BaumDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, GermanyORCID 0000-0002-0737-297X
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEKlinikum Leverkusen · DEAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRIran University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Insubria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Rising caesarean delivery (CD) rates throughout the world are accompanied with high rates of severe maternal complications. The aim of the present study was to analyze the outcome of trial of labor after caesarean section (TOLAC) in a Western population and identify factors associated with the success of vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC). Material and Methods: A retrospective study was performed at two large obstetric departments in Germany from 2008 to 2018. Women with singleton pregnancies, a history of only one previous CD with a low transverse incision, a viable fetus in cephalic presentation, and gestational age >32 weeks were included in the study. The characteristics and outcome of successful VBAC and failed TOLAC were compared. A subgroup analysis addressed gestational age, interpregnancy interval, fetal macrosomia, body mass index, and maternal age. Results: Of 1,546 patients, 62.3% achieved VBAC while 37.7% had a secondary CD. Independent factors associated with the success of TOLAC were a history of vaginal birth in previous pregnancies (p<0.001) and the use of oxytocin (p<0.001), whereas preterm birth between gestational week 32 and 37 signified a higher risk of failed TOLAC (p=0.04). The success of VBAC did not differ significantly for patients older than 40 years of age, those with a shorter interpregnancy interval than 12 months, and fetal macrosomia with birth weight exceeding 4000 grams. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were poorer in women with failed TOLAC. Conclusion: Nearly two thirds of women with a history of CD achieve VBAC in Germany. Previous vaginal birth and the augmentation of labor with oxytocin are positively associated with the achievement of VBAC and no major perinatal complications. The decision to have a TOLAC should be encouraged in the majority of patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate the feasibility of TOLAC in preterm delivery.

Indexed as

maternal outcomeneonatal outcomepredictorsrisk factorsTOLACVBAC

Identifiers

PMID35781586
PMCPMC9450926
OpenAlexW4283800214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.