ArticleBritish journal of haematology2022
Integrating artificial intelligence into haematology training and practice: Opportunities, threats and proposed solutions.
Article in British journal of haematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning for Multi-Omics Characterization of Blood Cancers: A Systematic Review.Cells · 2025Pooled it
- Hematology-Oncology Fellows' Use of Artificial Intelligence: A Multicenter Educational Practice and Needs Assessment Survey.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- An interpretable machine learning model integrating peripheral blood lncRNAs and clinical variables for phase classification in chronic myeloid leukemia.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Evaluating AI in leukocyte classification: performance of the AI system against 15 morphology experts.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Transformative Potential, Current Applications, and Future Implications.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Drug-Induced and Idiosyncratic Cytopenia: The Role of AI in Prevention, Prediction, and Patient Participation.Hematology reports · 2025Review
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Diagnostic Cytology and Genomic Testing for Hematologic Disorders.Cells · 2023Review
- Integrating artificial intelligence into haematology training and practice: Opportunities, threats and proposed solutions.British journal of haematology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There remains a limited emphasis on the use beyond the research domain of artificial intelligence (AI) in haematology and it does not feature significantly in postgraduate medical education and training. This perspective article considers recent developments in the field of AI research in haematology and anticipates the potential benefits and risks associated with its deeper integration into the specialty. Anxiety towards the greater use of AI in healthcare stems from legitimate concerns surrounding data protection, lack of transparency in clinical decision-making, and erosion of the doctor-patient relationship. The specialty of haematology has successfully embraced multiple disruptive innovations. We are at the cusp of a new era of closer integration of AI into routine haematology practice that will ultimately benefit patient care but to harness its benefits the next generation of haematologists will need access to bespoke learning opportunities with input from data scientists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.