ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2022
Endometrial biopsy under direct hysteroscopic visualisation versus blind endometrial sampling for the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of endometrial sampling tests for detecting endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2023Pooled it
- Advances in urinary biomarkers for endometrial cancer detection.British journal of cancer · 2026Review
- Observational
- Artificial Intelligence, Deep Learning, and Computer Vision in Hysteroscopy: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advanced endometrial cancer in the gulf cooperation council: a modified-Delphi consensus on unmet needs, molecular testing, and treatment sequencing.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Molecular classification and immunotherapy in fertility-sparing treatment for endometrial cancer: opportunities and challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Clinical value of D-dimer combined with transvaginal ultrasonography in the postmenopausal population with endometrial carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Is It Possible to Access the Uterus of Sheep by Endoscopy: Studies of Vaginoscopy and Hysteroscopy with Transcervical Uterine Access in Sheep.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Value of endometrial biopsy in patients with hysteroscopically atrophic endometrium in patients with postmenopausal bleeding.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
- Hysteroscopy vs. Vabra in Endometrial Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Cancers · 2025Review
- Review
- Advancements in Minimally Invasive Techniques and Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Novel Diagnostic Approaches and Clinical Implications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Endometrial Atypical Hyperplasia and Risk of Endometrial Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Staging by imaging in gynecologic cancer and the role of ultrasound: an update of European joint consensus statements.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2024Review
- Estro-progestin and progestogen intake: What's the impact on hysteroscopic imaging?Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2023Article
- ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE Guidelines for the fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2023Article
- ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE Guidelines for the fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinomaHuman reproduction open · 2023Article
- Comparison of Hysteroscopic and Blind Endometrial Biopsy Techniques in Postmenopausal Women.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological neoplasia in western countries. Diagnosis of endometrial cancer requires an endometrial biopsy. A good quality endometrial biopsy allows not only the identification of the pathology, but also preoperative histologic subtype classification. Endometrial biopsy can be performed under direct hysteroscopic visualisation, but also using blind sampling techniques. Objectives: To compare endometrial biopsy performed under direct hysteroscopic visualisation versus blind sampling for the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer. Materials and Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Electronic databases were searched from their inception until March 2022.We included all studies comparing endometrial biopsy performed under direct hysteroscopic visualisation versus blind endometrial sampling. Main outcome measures: Sample adequacy, failure rate to detect endometrial cancer or endometrial hyperplasia, and rate of detection of endometrial cancer. The summary measures were reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% of confidence interval (CI). Results: Four studies with a total of 1,295 patients were included. Endometrial biopsy under direct hysteroscopic visualisation was associated with a significantly higher rate of sample adequacy (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.17), and significantly lower risk of failure to detect endometrial cancer or endometrial hyperplasia (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.92) compared to blind endometrial sampling. However, there was no significant difference between endometrial biopsies taken under direct hysteroscopic visualisation or blindly, with or without a preceding diagnostic hysteroscopy, in the rate of detection of endometrial cancer (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.06). Conclusion: Hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy under direct visualisation is associated with significantly higher rate of sample adequacy and is comparable to blind endometrial sampling for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and precancer. What is new?: Hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy under direct visualisation would be expected to reduce diagnostic failure for endometrial cancer compared to blind endometrial sampling.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.