Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35781076›Full record

ReviewAnaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine2022

Upcoming and urgent challenges in critical care research based on COVID-19 pandemic experience.

Franck Verdonk, Dorien Feyaerts, Rafael Badenes, Julie A Bastarache, Adrien Bouglé, Wesley Ely, Brice Gaudilliere, Christopher Howard, Katarzyna Kotfis, Alexandre Lautrette and 15 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Research priorities for intensive care: A stakeholder-informed priority-setting partnership.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Rethinking 'Recovery': A Comparative Qualitative Analysis of Experiences of Intensive Care With COVID and Long Covid in the United Kingdom.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Franck VerdonkDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpital Saint-Antoine Paris, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France and GRC 29, DMU DREAM, Sorbonne University, Paris, France; Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, CA, United States.
Dorien FeyaertsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, CA, United States.
Rafael BadenesDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hospital Clìnico Universitario de Valencia, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Julie A BastaracheDivision of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Adrien BougléSorbonne Université, GRC 29, AP-HP, DMU DREAM, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Institute of Cardiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Wesley ElyCritical Illness, Brain Dysfunction, and Survivorship (CIBS) Center, at the TN Valley VA Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center (GRECC) and Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Brice GaudilliereDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, CA, United States.
Christopher HowardDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
Katarzyna KotfisDepartment Anaesthesiology, Intensive Therapy and Acute Intoxications, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Alexandre LautretteMedical Intensive Care Unit, Gabriel-Montpied University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Matthieu Le DorzeDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, AP-HP, Lariboisière University Hospital, Paris, France.
Babith Joseph MankidyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
Michael A MatthayDepartments of Medicine and Anesthesia, University of California, and Cardiovascular Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Christopher K MorganDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
Aurélien MazeraudService d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Groupe Hospitalier Université Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Pôle Neuro, Paris, France.
Brijesh V PatelDivision of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine, and Intensive Care, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, and Department of Adult Intensive Care, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, Guys & St Thomas' NHS Foundation trust, London, UK.
Rajyabardhan PattnaikDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Ispat General Hospital, Rourkela, Sundargarh, Odisha, India.
Jean ReuterDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Marcus J SchultzDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tarek SharsharService d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Groupe Hospitalier Université Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Pôle Neuro, Paris, France.
Gentle S ShresthaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Charles VerdonkUnit of Neurophysiology of Stress, Department of Neurosciences and Cognitive Sciences, French Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute, Brétigny-sur-Orge, France.
Lorraine B WareDivision of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Romain PirracchioDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, University of California San Francisco, CA, United States.
Matthieu JabaudonDepartment of Perioperative Medicine, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France; iGReD, Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, INSERM, Clermont-Ferrand, France. Electronic address: mjabaudon@chu-clermontferrand.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic placed a heavy burden on healthcare systems worldwide, it also induced urgent mobilisation of research teams to develop treatments preventing or curing the disease and its consequences. It has, therefore, challenged critical care research to rapidly focus on specific fields while forcing critical care physicians to make difficult ethical decisions. This narrative review aims to summarise critical care research -from organisation to research fields- in this pandemic setting and to highlight opportunities to improve research efficiency in the future, based on what is learned from COVID-19. This pressure on research revealed, i.e., (i) the need to harmonise regulatory processes between countries, allowing simplified organisation of international research networks to improve their efficiency in answering large-scale questions; (ii) the importance of developing translational research from which therapeutic innovations can emerge; (iii) the need for improved triage and predictive scores to rationalise admission to the intensive care unit. In this context, key areas for future critical care research and better pandemic preparedness are artificial intelligence applied to healthcare, characterisation of long-term symptoms, and ethical considerations. Such collaborative research efforts should involve groups from both high and low-to-middle income countries to propose worldwide solutions. As a conclusion, stress tests on healthcare organisations should be viewed as opportunities to design new research frameworks and strategies. Worldwide availability of research networks ready to operate is essential to be prepared for next pandemics. Importantly, researchers and physicians should prioritise realistic and ethical goals for both clinical care and research.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsArtificial IntelligenceCritical CareDelivery of Health CareHumansCOVID-19Critical carePandemicPerspectivesResearch

Identifiers

PMID35781076
PMCPMC9245393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.