Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35780462›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2022

Chasing perception in domestic cats and dogs.

Judit Abdai, Stefania Uccheddu, Márta Gácsi, Ádám Miklósi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Perception of animate motion in dogs.Frontiers in psychology · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Judit AbdaiMTA-ELTE Comparative Ethology Research Group, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1219-2858
Stefania UcchedduMTA-ELTE Comparative Ethology Research Group, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0951-0627
Márta GácsiMTA-ELTE Comparative Ethology Research Group, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3080-7545
Ádám MiklósiMTA-ELTE Comparative Ethology Research Group, Budapest, Hungary. adam.miklosi@ttk.elte.hu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4831-8985
Eötvös Loránd University · HU

Funding

Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap TKP2020- IKA-05Office for Supported Research Groups MTA 01 031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chasing motion is often used to study the perception of inanimate objects as animate. When chasing interaction and independent motions between two agents are displayed simultaneously on a screen, we expect observers to quickly perceive and recognise the chasing pattern (because of its familiarity) and turn their attention to the independent motion (novelty effect). In case of isosceles triangles as moving figures, dogs and humans both display this behaviour, but dogs initially preferred to look at the chasing pattern whereas humans started to increase their gaze towards the independent motion earlier. Here, we compared whether family cats perceive moving inanimate objects as animate and whether their looking behaviour is similar to that of small family dogs. We displayed a chasing and independent motion side by side on a screen in two consecutive trials and assessed subjects' looking behaviour towards the motions. Similarly to previous studies, we found that dogs eventually looked longer at the independent motion, but cats preferred to look at the independent motion at the beginning of the video display and only later shifted their attention to the chasing motion. No difference was found in the frequency of gaze alternation of the two species. Thus, although cats discriminate between the chasing and independent motions, it is not clear whether this discrimination is controlled by animate motion cues. The difference may originate from their ecological situation and/or may be explained by specific perceptual mechanisms.

Indexed as

CatsDogsMotion PerceptionAnimalsAttentionBehavior, AnimalCuesHumansAnimacy perceptionCatChasingComparative perceptionDog

Identifiers

PMID35780462
PMCPMC9652223
OpenAlexW4283785247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.