Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35780452›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2022

Impact of Renal Cell Carcinoma Histological Variants on Recurrence After Partial Nephrectomy: A Multi-Institutional, Prospective Study (UROCCR Study 82).

Thomas Tabourin, Ugo Pinar, Jerome Parra, Christophe Vaessen, Charles-Karim Bensalah, Francois Audenet, Pierre Bigot, Cecile Champy, Jonathan Olivier, Franck Bruyere and 18 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas TabourinSorbonne University, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, F-75013, Paris, France.
Ugo PinarSorbonne University, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, F-75013, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6135-1005
Jerome ParraSorbonne University, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, F-75013, Paris, France.
Christophe VaessenSorbonne University, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, F-75013, Paris, France.
Charles-Karim BensalahDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France.
Francois AudenetDepartment of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP Centre, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Pierre BigotDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France.
Cecile ChampyDepartment of Urology, APHP, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Créteil, France.
Jonathan OlivierDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Lille, Lille, France.
Franck BruyereDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France.
Nicolas DoumercDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Philippe PaparelDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Lyon, Lyon, France.
Bastien ParierAPHP Department of Urology, Bicetre University Hospital, Paris Saclay University, Le Kremlin Bicetre, France.
Francois-Xavier NouhaudDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Rouen, Rouen, France.
Xavier DurandDepartment of Urology, Hospital Saint Joseph, Paris, France.
Herve LangDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Nicolas BrangerDepartment of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Jean-Alexandre LongDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
Matthieu DurandDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France.
Thibaut WaeckelDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France.
Thomas CharlesDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Olivier CussenotSorbonne Université, GRC n°5, AP-HP, Tenon Hospital, 75020, Paris, France.
Evanguelos XylinasUrology Department, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris University, Paris, France.
Romain BoissierDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Marseille, Marseille, France.
Ricky TambweDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Reims, Reims, France.
Jean-Jacques PatardDepartment of Urology, Hospital of Mont-de-Marsan, Mont-de-Marsan, France.
Jean-Christophe BernhardDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Morgan RoupretSorbonne University, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, F-75013, Paris, France. morgan.roupret@aphp.fr.
Sorbonne Université · FRAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRHôpital Saint Joseph · FRHôpitaux Universitaires Henri-Mondor · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRInstitut Paoli-Calmettes · FRLille’s Cardiology Hospital · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité d'Angers · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversité de Caen Normandie · FRUniversité de Poitiers · FRUniversité de Rouen Normandie · FRUniversité de Strasbourg · FRUniversité de Tours · FRUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognostic impact of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) morphotype remains unclear in patients who undergo partial nephrectomy (PN). Our objective was to determine the risk factors for recurrence after PN, including RCC morphotype.

methodsPatients with RCC who had undergone PN were extracted from the prospective, national French database, UroCCR. Patients with genetic predisposition, bilateral or multiple tumours, and those who had undergone secondary totalization were excluded. Primary endpoint was 5-year, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Risk factors for recurrence were assessed by multivariable Cox regression analysis.

resultsOverall, 2,767 patients were included (70% male; median age: 61 years [interquartile range (IQR) 51-69]). Most (71.5%) of the PN procedures were robot-assisted. Overall, 2,573 (93.0%) patients were recurrence free, and 74 died (2.7%). Five-year RFS was 84.9% (IQR 82.4-87.4). A significant difference in RFS was observed between RCC morphotypes (p < 0.001). Surgical margins (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.0 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3-3.2], p < 0.01), pT stage >1 (HR = 2.6 [95% CI: 1.8-3.7], p < 0.01]) and Fuhrmann grade >2 (HR = 1.9 [95% CI: 1.4-2.6], p < 0.001) were risk factors for recurrence, whereas chromophobe subtype was a protective factor (HR = 0.08 [95% CI: 0.01-0.6], p = 0.02). Five-year OS was 94.0% [92.4-95.7], and there were no significant differences between RCC subgroups (p = 0.06). The main study limitation was its design (multicentre national database), which may be responsible for declarative bias.

conclusionsChromophobe morphotype was significantly associated with better RFS in RCC patients who underwent PN. Conversely, pT stage, Fuhrman group and positive surgical margins were risk factors for recurrence.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMargins of ExcisionMiddle AgedNephrectomyPrognosisProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35780452
OpenAlexW4283785392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.