Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35780439›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2022

Screening gene signatures for clinical response subtypes of lung transplantation.

Yu-Hang Zhang, Zhan Dong Li, Tao Zeng, Lei Chen, Tao Huang, Yu-Dong Cai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Understanding Machine Learning Applications in Lung Transplantation: A Narrative Review.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yu-Hang Zhang *School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China.
Zhan Dong Li *College of Food Engineering, Jilin Engineering Normal University, Changchun, 130052, China.
Tao Zeng *Bio-Med Big Data Center, CAS Key Laboratory of Computational Biology, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China.
Lei ChenCollege of Information Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, 201306, China.
Tao HuangBio-Med Big Data Center, CAS Key Laboratory of Computational Biology, Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China. tohuangtao@126.com.
Yu-Dong CaiSchool of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China. cai_yud@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5664-7979
Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health · CNShanghai University · CNJilin Engineering Normal University · CNShanghai Maritime University · CN

Funding

Fund of the Key Laboratory of Tissue Microenvironment and Tumor of Chinese Academy of Sciences 202002National Key R&D Program of China 2018YFC0910403Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences XDA26040304Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences XDB38050200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung is the most important organ in the human respiratory system, whose normal functions are quite essential for human beings. Under certain pathological conditions, the normal lung functions could no longer be maintained in patients, and lung transplantation is generally applied to ease patients' breathing and prolong their lives. However, several risk factors exist during and after lung transplantation, including bleeding, infection, and transplant rejections. In particular, transplant rejections are difficult to predict or prevent, leading to the most dangerous complications and severe status in patients undergoing lung transplantation. Given that most common monitoring and validation methods for lung transplantation rejections may take quite a long time and have low reproducibility, new technologies and methods are required to improve the efficacy and accuracy of rejection monitoring after lung transplantation. Recently, one previous study set up the gene expression profiles of patients who underwent lung transplantation. However, it did not provide a tool to predict lung transplantation responses. Here, a further deep investigation was conducted on such profiling data. A computational framework, incorporating several machine learning algorithms, such as feature selection methods and classification algorithms, was built to establish an effective prediction model distinguishing patient into different clinical subgroups, corresponding to different rejection responses after lung transplantation. Furthermore, the framework also screened essential genes with functional enrichments and create quantitative rules for the distinction of patients with different rejection responses to lung transplantation. The outcome of this contribution could provide guidelines for clinical treatment of each rejection subtype and contribute to the revealing of complicated rejection mechanisms of lung transplantation.

Indexed as

Lung TransplantationGraft RejectionHumansLungReproducibility of ResultsTranscriptomeClassification algorithmFeature selectionGene signaturesLung transplantation

Identifiers

PMID35780439
OpenAlexW4283786317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.