Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35780386›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2022

An Outsider's Perspective on Why We Climb Mountains and Why Projects Like the i5k Matter.

David C Molik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David C MolikTropical Pest Genetics and Molecular Biology Research Unit, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Hilo, HI 96720, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3192-6538

Funding

USDA ARS 0500-00093-001-00-DU.S. Department of Agriculture
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Initiatives like the i5k are creating evermore genome assemblies. These initiatives are resource heavy, and their justifications and economics deserve attention. Scientifically, these initiatives are important, paving the way for cross-species analysis, requiring the building of new computational analysis and tools, and creating other new resources. However, an open question remains of how we quantitively measure the impact of genomes, and by extension these initiatives. This forum article discusses one such method which is to look at the publications about a species over time, however, this method does not show any signal from a published genome, leaving an open question of how to measure impact.

Indexed as

GenomeAnimalscomputer sciencegenetic research/engineeringgenetics

Identifiers

PMID35780386
PMCPMC9250708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.