Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35780224›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Olfactory modulation of barrel cortex activity during active whisking and passive whisker stimulation.

Anthony Renard, Evan R Harrell, Brice Bathellier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Vibrissal sensing in mammals in a changing world.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Expectation Based on Olfactory Cues Impacts Learned Auditory Associations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Anthony RenardInstitut Pasteur, INSERM, Institut de l'Audition, 63 rue de Charenton, F-75012, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8681-8695
Evan R HarrellInstitut Pasteur, INSERM, Institut de l'Audition, 63 rue de Charenton, F-75012, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4376-9405
Brice BathellierInstitut Pasteur, INSERM, Institut de l'Audition, 63 rue de Charenton, F-75012, Paris, France. brice.bathellier@cnrs.fr.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rodents depend on olfaction and touch to meet many of their fundamental needs. However, the impact of simultaneous olfactory and tactile inputs on sensory representations in the cortex remains elusive. To study these interactions, we recorded large populations of barrel cortex neurons using 2-photon calcium imaging in head-fixed mice during olfactory and tactile stimulation. Here we show that odors bidirectionally alter activity in a small but significant population of barrel cortex neurons through at least two mechanisms, first by enhancing whisking, and second by a central mechanism that persists after whisking is abolished by facial nerve sectioning. Odor responses have little impact on tactile information, and they are sufficient for decoding odor identity, while behavioral parameters like whisking, sniffing, and facial movements are not odor identity-specific. Thus, barrel cortex activity encodes specific olfactory information that is not linked with odor-induced changes in behavior.

Indexed as

SmellVibrissaeAnimalsCerebral CortexMiceSomatosensory CortexTouch

Identifiers

PMID35780224
PMCPMC9250522
OpenAlexW4283777379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.