Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35780221›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2022

The effects of face coverings, own-ethnicity biases, and attitudes on emotion recognition.

Holly Cooper, Amrit Brar, Hazel Beyaztas, Ben J Jennings, Rachel J Bennetts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Inferring social signals from the eyes in male schizophrenia.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Emotions behind a mask: the value of disgust.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Holly CooperDivision of Psychology, College of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, UK. Holly.Cooper@brunel.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7984-9773
Amrit BrarDivision of Psychology, College of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, UK.
Hazel BeyaztasDivision of Psychology, College of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, UK.
Ben J JenningsDivision of Psychology, College of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2472-5615
Rachel J BennettsDivision of Psychology, College of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, UK. Rachel.Bennetts@brunel.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3543-9836

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, face coverings were introduced as a safety measure in certain environments in England and some research suggests that they can affect emotion recognition. Factors such as own-ethnicity bias (e.g. whether people perceiving and expressing emotions are of the same ethnicity) and social biases are also known to influence emotion recognition. However, it is unclear whether these factors interact with face coverings to affect emotion recognition. Therefore, this study examined the effects of face coverings, own-ethnicity biases, and attitudes on emotion recognition accuracy. In this study, 131 participants viewed masked and unmasked emotional faces varying in ethnicity and completed a questionnaire on their attitudes towards face masks. We found that emotion recognition was associated with masks and attitudes: accuracy was lower in masked than unmasked conditions and attitudes towards masks Inside and Outside were associated with emotion recognition. However, a match between perceiver and stimulus ethnicity did not have a significant effect on emotion recognition. Ultimately, our results suggest that masks, and negative attitudes towards them, were associated with poorer emotion recognition. Future research should explore different mask-wearing behaviours and possible in-group/out-group biases and their interaction with other social cues (e.g. in-group biases).

Indexed as

COVID-19Facial ExpressionBiasEmotionsEthnicityHumansPandemicsRecognition, PsychologyEmotion recognitionFace coveringsMask attitudesOwn-ethnicity bias

Identifiers

PMID35780221
PMCPMC9250564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.