Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35780195›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2022

Ventilatory settings in the initial 72 h and their association with outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: a preplanned secondary analysis of the targeted hypothermia versus targeted normothermia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (TTM2) trial.

Chiara Robba, Rafael Badenes, Denise Battaglini, Lorenzo Ball, Iole Brunetti, Janus C Jakobsen, Gisela Lilja, Hans Friberg, Pedro D Wendel-Garcia, Paul J Young and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Capillary hemoglobin dynamics in COIntensive care medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Chiara RobbaAnesthesia and Critical Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genoa, Italy. kiarobba@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1628-3845
Rafael BadenesDepartment of Anesthesiology and Surgical-Trauma Intensive Care, Hospital Clínic Universitari de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Denise BattagliniAnesthesia and Critical Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genoa, Italy.
Lorenzo BallAnesthesia and Critical Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genoa, Italy.
Iole BrunettiAnesthesia and Critical Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genoa, Italy.
Janus C JakobsenCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gisela LiljaDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Getingevägen 4, 222 41, Lund, Sweden.
Hans FribergDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Pedro D Wendel-GarciaInstitute of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
Paul J YoungMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Private Bag 7902, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand.
Glenn EastwoodDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Michelle S ChewDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Johan UndenDepartment of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Matthew ThomasUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.
Michael JoannidisDivision of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Alistair NicholMonash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Andreas LundinDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 423 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Jacob HollenbergDepartment of Medicine, Centre for Resuscitation Science, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset Sjukhusbacken 10, Solna, 118 83, Stockholm, Sweden.
Naomi HammondMalcolm Fisher Department of Intensive Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Manoj SaxenaIntensive Care Unit, St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Martin AnnbornDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Miroslav SolarDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
Fabio S TacconeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Hopital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium.
Josef DankiewiczDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund, Cardiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Niklas Nielsen *Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care and Clinical Sciences Helsingborg, Helsingborg Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Paolo Pelosi *Anesthesia and Critical Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genoa, Italy.
TTM2 Trial Collaborators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe optimal ventilatory settings in patients after cardiac arrest and their association with outcome remain unclear. The aim of this study was to describe the ventilatory settings applied in the first 72 h of mechanical ventilation in patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and their association with 6-month outcomes.

methodsPreplanned sub-analysis of the Target Temperature Management-2 trial. Clinical outcomes were mortality and functional status (assessed by the Modified Rankin Scale) 6 months after randomization.

resultsA total of 1848 patients were included (mean age 64 [Standard Deviation, SD = 14] years). At 6 months, 950 (51%) patients were alive and 898 (49%) were dead. Median tidal volume (V

conclusionsProtective ventilation strategies are commonly applied in patients after cardiac arrest. Ventilator settings in the first 72 h after hospital admission, in particular driving pressure and respiratory rate, may influence 6-month outcomes.

Indexed as

HypothermiaOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestHumansMiddle AgedRespiration, ArtificialTidal VolumeVentilators, MechanicalCardiac arrestDriving pressureMechanical powerMechanical ventilationOutcomeVentilator settings

Identifiers

PMID35780195
PMCPMC9304050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.