Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35780103›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2022

A longitudinal study of naloxone opioid overdose awareness and reversal training for first-year medical students: specific elements require reinforcement.

Reena K Sandhu, Michael V Heller, Jack Buckanavage, Benjamin Haslund-Gourley, Joshua Leckron, Brady Kupersmith, Nathaniel C Goss, Kyle Samson, Annette B Gadegbeku

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Caring for Patients with Opioid Use Disorder: A Near-Peer Workshop for Medical Students.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Reena K SandhuDrexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. rks75@drexel.edu.
Michael V HellerDrexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jack BuckanavageDrexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Benjamin Haslund-GourleyDrexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Joshua LeckronDrexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Brady KupersmithDrexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Nathaniel C GossDrexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kyle SamsonDrexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Annette B GadegbekuDepartment of Family, Community and Preventive Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Drexel University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe opioid epidemic is a progressively worsening public health crisis that continues to impact healthcare system strategies such as overdose reversal and destigmatization. Even among healthcare professionals, there remains a lack of confidence in naloxone administration and a prevalence of stigma. While training can play a major impact in reducing these shortcomings, the long-term effectiveness has yet to be characterized in training healthcare professionals. This study examined the long-term retention of opioid overdose awareness and reversal training (OOART) by evaluating performance at two-time intervals, immediately post-training and at a 3-month follow-up.

methodsVoluntary training was offered to first-year (M1) medical students at the Drexel University College of Medicine in 2021. At this training, 118 students completed training, 95 completed the post-training survey, and 42 completed the 3-month follow-up.

resultsOpioid reversal knowledge questions assessed significantly increased scores post-training and at the 3-month follow-up. In three of the attitude questions, scores were improved at both follow-up timepoints. In addition, three attitude questions indicating a participant's confidence to respond to an opioid overdose situation increased directly after the training, but regressed at the 3-month follow-up. The remaining questions did not show any statistical difference across the survey intervals.

conclusionsThis study establishes that while OOART provides participants with the knowledge of how to respond to an opioid overdose, the retention of this knowledge at a 3-month interval is reduced. The results were mixed for longitudinal assessment of participant's attitudes toward people with opioid use disorder. Some positive increases in attitudes were retained at the 3-month interval, while others trended back toward pre-training levels. These results support the effectiveness of the training but also provide evidence that OOART must be reinforced often.

Indexed as

Opiate OverdoseStudents, MedicalAnalgesics, OpioidHumansLongitudinal StudiesNaloxoneAnalgesics, OpioidNaloxone

Identifiers

PMID35780103
PMCPMC9250225
OpenAlexW4283777126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.