ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2022
Isolated compounds from Dracaena angustifolia Roxb and acarbose synergistically/additively inhibit α-glucosidase and α-amylase: an in vitro study.
Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Flavonoids as dual-target inhibitors against α-glucosidase and α-amylase: a systematic review of in vitro studies.Natural products and bioprospecting · 2024Review
- Screening and Characterization of an α-Amylase Inhibitor fromFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs a traditional herbal medicine, Dracaena angustifolia Roxb has been used as an anti-inflammatory agent by the Li people in Hainan, China. In preliminary phytochemical studies conducted in our lab, its fractions were found to inhibit α-glucosidase in vitro, indicating a potential for alleviating glucose dysregulation.
methodsThrough in vitro enzymatic assays, the abilities of the separated components to affect α-glucosidase and α-amylase were evaluated. By establishing concentration gradients and generating Lineweaver-Burk plots, the corresponding inhibition modes together with kinetic parameters were assessed. Following the evaluation of the outcomes of their combination with acarbose, computational docking and molecular dynamic simulations were carried out to analyse the interaction mechanisms and perform virtual screening against human enzymes.
resultsCompared with acarbose, 7 compounds, including flavonoid derivatives, amides and aromatic derivatives, with higher α-glucosidase inhibitory efficiencies were confirmed. It was found that those competitive/mixed candidates and acarbose interacted synergistically or additively on α-glucosidase. Moreover, 3 of them were able to inhibit α-amylase in mixed mode, and additive effects were observed in combination with acarbose. Through in silico docking, it was found that the active site residues as well as adjacent residues were involved in α-glucosidase and α-amylase binding, which were mainly achieved through hydrogen bonding. Among those dual-function flavonoids, Compound 9 was predicted to be a considerable inhibitor of human enzymes, as the formation of ligand-enzyme complexes was mediated by the residues responsible for substrate recognition and catalysis, the stabilities of which were reiterated by molecular dynamics simulations.
conclusionDespite their mild effects on α-amylase, considerable α-glucosidase inhibitory efficiencies and potential synergy with acarbose were exhibited by these natural candidates. Furthermore, a stable ligand, human α-glucosidase, was predicted by the performed simulations, which provided useful information for the application of Dracaena angustifolia Roxb in diabetes treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.