Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35780085›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2022

Transcriptome changes associated with apple (Malus domestica) root defense response after Fusarium proliferatum f. sp. malus domestica infection.

Yanan Duan, Shurui Ma, Xuesen Chen, Xiang Shen, Chengmiao Yin, Zhiquan Mao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genome-Wide Transcriptional Response of Avocado toPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Gene Duplication and Functional Diversification of MADS-Box Genes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Resistant cumin cultivar, GC-4 countersFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yanan DuanCollege of Horticulture Science and Engineering, National Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, 271018, Shangdong, China.
Shurui MaCollege of Horticulture Science and Engineering, National Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, 271018, Shangdong, China.
Xuesen ChenCollege of Horticulture Science and Engineering, National Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, 271018, Shangdong, China.
Xiang ShenCollege of Horticulture Science and Engineering, National Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, 271018, Shangdong, China.
Chengmiao YinCollege of Horticulture Science and Engineering, National Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, 271018, Shangdong, China. yinchengmiao@163.com.
Zhiquan MaoCollege of Horticulture Science and Engineering, National Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, 271018, Shangdong, China. mzhiquan@sdau.edu.cn.
Shandong Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApple replant disease is a soilborne disease caused by Fusarium proliferatum f. sp. malus domestica strain MR5 (abbreviated hereafter as Fpmd MR5) in China. This pathogen causes root tissue rot and wilting leaves in apple seedlings, leading to plant death. A comparative transcriptome analysis was conducted using the Illumina Novaseq platform to identify the molecular defense mechanisms of the susceptible M.26 and the resistant M9T337 apple rootstocks to Fpmd MR5 infection.

resultsApproximately 518.1 million high-quality reads were generated using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). Comparative analysis between the mock-inoculated and Fpmd MR5 infected apple rootstocks revealed 28,196 significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs), including 14,572 up-regulated and 13,624 down-regulated genes. Among them, the transcriptomes in the roots of the susceptible genotype M.26 were reflected by overrepresented DEGs. MapMan analysis indicated that a large number of DEGs were involved in the response of apple plants to Fpmd MR5 stress. The important functional groups identified via gene ontology (GO) and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment were responsible for fundamental biological regulation, secondary metabolism, plant-pathogen recognition, and plant hormone signal transduction (ethylene and jasmonate). Furthermore, the expression of 33 up-regulated candidate genes (12 related to WRKY DNA-binding proteins, one encoding endochitinase, two encoding beta-glucosidases, ten related to pathogenesis-related proteins, and eight encoding ethylene-responsive transcription factors) were validated by quantitative real-time PCR.

conclusionRNA-seq profiling was performed for the first time to analyze response of apple root to Fpmd MR5 infection. We found that the production of antimicrobial compounds and antioxidants enhanced plant resistance to pathogens, and pathogenesis-related protein (PR10 homologs, chitinase, and beta-glucosidase) may play unique roles in the defense response. These results provide new insights into the mechanisms of the apple root response to Fpmd MR5 infection.

Indexed as

MalusEthylenesFusariumGene Expression Regulation, PlantPlant DiseasesTranscriptomeEthylenesApple replant diseaseFusarium proliferatum f. sp. malus domesticaRoot defense responseSecondary metabolismTranscriptome analysis

Identifiers

PMID35780085
PMCPMC9250749
OpenAlexW4283780618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.