Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35779714›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2022

Five-week warning of COVID-19 peaks prior to the Omicron surge in Detroit, Michigan using wastewater surveillance.

Liang Zhao, Yangyang Zou, Yabing Li, Brijen Miyani, Maddie Spooner, Zachary Gentry, Sydney Jacobi, Randy E David, Scott Withington, Stacey McFarlane and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Liang ZhaoDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, 1449 Engineering Research Ct, East Lansing, MI 48823, United States of America.
Yangyang ZouDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, 1449 Engineering Research Ct, East Lansing, MI 48823, United States of America.
Yabing LiDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, 1449 Engineering Research Ct, East Lansing, MI 48823, United States of America.
Brijen MiyaniDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, 1449 Engineering Research Ct, East Lansing, MI 48823, United States of America.
Maddie SpoonerDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, 1449 Engineering Research Ct, East Lansing, MI 48823, United States of America.
Zachary GentryDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, 1449 Engineering Research Ct, East Lansing, MI 48823, United States of America.
Sydney JacobiDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, 1449 Engineering Research Ct, East Lansing, MI 48823, United States of America.
Randy E DavidDetroit Health Department, 100 Mack Ave, Detroit, MI 48201, United States of America.
Scott WithingtonDetroit Health Department, 100 Mack Ave, Detroit, MI 48201, United States of America.
Stacey McFarlaneMacomb County Health Division, 43525 Elizabeth Rd, Mount Clemens, MI 48043, United States of America.
Russell FaustOakland County Health Division, 1200 Telegraph Rd, Pontiac, MI 48341, United States of America.
Johnathon SheetsCDM-Smith, 535 Griswold St, Detroit, MI 48226, United States of America.
Andrew KayeCDM-Smith, 535 Griswold St, Detroit, MI 48226, United States of America.
James BrozCDM-Smith, 535 Griswold St, Detroit, MI 48226, United States of America.
Anil GosineDetroit Water and Sewerage Department, 735 Randolph Street building, Detroit, MI 48226, United States of America.
Palencia MobleyDetroit Water and Sewerage Department, 735 Randolph Street building, Detroit, MI 48226, United States of America.
Andrea W U BuschGreat Lakes Water Authority, 735 Randolph, Detroit, MI 48226, United States of America.
John NortonGreat Lakes Water Authority, 735 Randolph, Detroit, MI 48226, United States of America.
Irene XagorarakiDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, 1449 Engineering Research Ct, East Lansing, MI 48823, United States of America. Electronic address: xagorara@msu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) is useful in predicting temporal fluctuations of COVID-19 incidence in communities and providing early warnings of pending outbreaks. To investigate the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 concentrations in wastewater and COVID-19 incidence in communities, a 12-month study between September 1, 2020, and August 31, 2021, prior to the Omicron surge, was conducted. 407 untreated wastewater samples were collected from the Great Lakes Water Authority (GLWA) in southeastern Michigan. N1 and N2 genes of SARS-CoV-2 were quantified using RT-ddPCR. Daily confirmed COVID-19 cases for the City of Detroit, and Wayne, Macomb, Oakland counties between September 1, 2020, and October 4, 2021, were collected from a public data source. The total concentrations of N1 and N2 genes ranged from 714.85 to 7145.98 gc/L and 820.47 to 6219.05 gc/L, respectively, which were strongly correlated with the 7-day moving average of total daily COVID-19 cases in the associated areas, after 5 weeks of the viral measurement. The results indicate a potential 5-week lag time of wastewater surveillance preceding COVID-19 incidence for the Detroit metropolitan area. Four statistical models were established to analyze the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 concentrations in wastewater and COVID-19 incidence in the study areas. Under a 5-week lag time scenario with both N1 and N2 genes, the autoregression model with seasonal patterns and vector autoregression model were more effective in predicting COVID-19 cases during the study period. To investigate the impact of flow parameters on the correlation, the original N1 and N2 gene concentrations were normalized by wastewater flow parameters. The statistical results indicated the optimum models were consistent for both normalized and non-normalized data. In addition, we discussed parameters that explain the observed lag time. Furthermore, we evaluated the impact of the omicron surge that followed, and the impact of different sampling methods on the estimation of lag time.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansMichiganSARS-CoV-2WastewaterWastewater-Based Epidemiological MonitoringWastewaterCOVID-19DetroitEarly warningPredictionSARS-CoV-2Wastewater-based-epidemiology (WBE)

Identifiers

PMID35779714
PMCPMC9239917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.