Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35779478›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2022

Multi-branch fusion auxiliary learning for the detection of pneumonia from chest X-ray images.

Jia Liu, Jing Qi, Wei Chen, Yongjian Nian

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Deep Learning for Detecting COVID-19 Using Medical Images.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jia LiuDepartment of Digital Medicine, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Medicine, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China.
Jing QiDepartment of Digital Medicine, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Medicine, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China.
Wei ChenDepartment of Radiology, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China.
Yongjian NianDepartment of Digital Medicine, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Medicine, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China. Electronic address: yjnian@tmmu.edu.cn.
Army Medical University · CNSouthwest Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung infections caused by bacteria and viruses are infectious and require timely screening and isolation, and different types of pneumonia require different treatment plans. Therefore, finding a rapid and accurate screening method for lung infections is critical. To achieve this goal, we proposed a multi-branch fusion auxiliary learning (MBFAL) method for pneumonia detection from chest X-ray (CXR) images. The MBFAL method was used to perform two tasks through a double-branch network. The first task was to recognize the absence of pneumonia (normal), COVID-19, other viral pneumonia and bacterial pneumonia from CXR images, and the second task was to recognize the three types of pneumonia from CXR images. The latter task was used to assist the learning of the former task to achieve a better recognition effect. In the process of auxiliary parameter updating, the feature maps of different branches were fused after sample screening through label information to enhance the model's ability to recognize case of pneumonia without impacting its ability to recognize normal cases. Experiments show that an average classification accuracy of 95.61% is achieved using MBFAL. The single class accuracy for normal, COVID-19, other viral pneumonia and bacterial pneumonia was 98.70%, 99.10%, 96.60% and 96.80%, respectively, and the recall was 97.20%, 98.60%, 96.10% and 89.20%, respectively, using the MBFAL method. Compared with the baseline model and the model constructed using the above methods separately, better results for the rapid screening of pneumonia were achieved using MBFAL.

Indexed as

COVID-19Deep LearningPneumonia, ViralHumansSARS-CoV-2X-RaysAuxiliary learningDeep learningFeature fusionMulti-task learningPneumonia

Identifiers

PMID35779478
PMCPMC9212341
OpenAlexW4282979754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.