University without Borders.

Luca Tateo, Giuseppina Marsico, He Min, Maria Virginia Machado Dazzani

Abstract readComment

In one paragraph

Article in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

Comment on
Social Normativity of Research Methods and the Methodological Discrepancy between Mainstream Psychological Research and Danish Psychology Students' Master's Thesis Projects.2022

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luca TateoDepartment of Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, Sem Sælands vei 7, Helga Engs hus, 0371, Oslo, Norway. luca.tateo@isp.uio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3207-6312

Giuseppina MarsicoUniversity of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8683-2814

He MinEast China Normal University, Shanghai, China.

Maria Virginia Machado DazzaniFederal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5303-3576

Funding

CAPES-Print process no. 88887.568332/2020-00CNPq MCTIC/CNPq no. 28/2018/process 435602/2018-7Direktoratet for internasjonalisering og kvalitetsutvikling i høgare utdanning UTF-202/10072

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The paper discusses the problem of master theses' production in psychology from a decolonial perspective. It presents a critique to the reproductive and monological model of knowledge currently promoted in higher education. Then, it proposes an alternative pedagogic model of research-tandem. The research-tandem is an example of an innovative way of understanding a university without borders, as developed within the international network of excellence "IBEF- Ideas for the Basic Education of the Future". Higher education must be detached from national-based curricula, and become a nomadic and collaborative across-cultural knowledge building endeavor. Current higher education aims to be national in its curricula but global in its marketability. In cultural psychology's perspective, higher education of the future shall be regarded as global in its vision yet local in its solutions. Future students must have the opportunity to build new knowledge by experiencing and sharing diversity rather than complying with standardized and monological trajectories.

Indexed as

CurriculumStudentsHumansKnowledgeUniversitiesCultural psychologyDecolonizing higher educationMethodologyResearch-tandem dissertationStudent international mobility

Identifiers

PMID35779222

DOI10.1007/978-3-030-75851-6

PMCPMC9636089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.