ReviewAnnals of intensive care2022
Ten actions to achieve gender equity among intensivists: the French Society of Intensive Care (FICS) model.
Review in Annals of intensive care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Women Physicians in Leadership Roles in Critical Care Medicine or Academic Medicine-A Systematic Literature Review.Critical care explorations · 2025Pooled it
- Beyond consensus: operationalizing gender equity and equality in intensive care medicine.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Well-being in intensive care: reflections from a multinational survey.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Article
- Gender equality and equity in intensive care: an international Delphi consensus study.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Impact of gender on how intensive care medicine residents experience their medical studies and training and perceive their specialty: a national survey.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
- [Working conditions in German intensive care units-A cross-professional analysis].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025Review
- Social capital as a catalyst for gender inequality: A scoping review of networking disparities in academic medicine.Cancer · 2025Article
- Barriers to female leadership in intensive care medicine: insights from an ESICM NEXT & Diversity Monitoring Group Survey.Annals of intensive care · 2024Article
- ISCCM Position Statement for Improving Gender Balance in Critical Care Medicine.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024Article
- Breaking the Glass Ceiling: Open Respiratory Archives Striving for Gender Equity in the Reviewer Field.Open respiratory archivesArticle
- A Cross-Sectional Study on the Representation of Women as Editors in MEDLINE-Indexed Occupational Health and Safety Journals.Indian journal of occupational and environmental medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In our recent survey, we aimed to collect information on perceived inequity as well as professional and personal fulfillment among women intensivists in France. For the 371 respondents out of the 732 persons who received the survey, the findings were unequivocal: for one-third of the respondents, being a woman was considered as an obstacle to careers or academic advancement, and for two thirds, pregnancy was viewed as a barrier to their career advancement. Gender discrimination had been experienced by 55% of the respondents. In 2019, to promote and achieve gender equity in the French Intensive Care Society (FICS), ten actions were initiated and are detailed in the present manuscript together with supporting data: (1) creation of a working group: the FEMMIR group; (2) promotion of mentorship; (3) implementation of concrete sponsorship; (4) transparency and public reporting of gender ratios in editorial boards; (5) workshops dedicated to unconscious gender bias; (6) workshops dedicated to improved women assertiveness; (7) role models; (8) creation of educational/information programs for young intensivists; (9) development of research on gender inequity and, as a perspective; and (10) development of a wide-ranging program. This review is aimed at providing a toolbox of organizational best practices designed to achieve gender equity. It is particularly important to share promising practical action engaged in our FEMMIR group with other concerned professionals around the world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.